From: Sreedhar Kodali <srkodali-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
pradeeps-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org,
linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] rsockets: distribute completion queue vectors among multiple cores
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 17:58:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <edc2b05703209d2a7626a31abb170ceb@imap.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540DF3CC.1060304-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
On 2014-09-08 23:52, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 09/08/14 16:27, Sreedhar Kodali wrote:
>> Thanks for your insights. Your suggestion of having a separate
>> vector per process is really useful when multiple processes are
>> simultaneously running in the same environment. At the implementation
>> level this requires an extended configuration file format. Can't
>> we possibly think of this as a next iteration?
>
> This patch introduces a new configuration file
> (/etc/rdma/rsocket/comp_vector). User expect that such configuration
> files remain supported after a software upgrade. In other words,
> introduction of a new configuration file deserves careful
> consideration. Do we really need this new configuration file ? Why not
> e.g. to change the default behavior of the rsockets library into
> spreading the interrupt processing workload over all completion
> vectors supported by the HCA ? Furthermore, the number of completion
> vectors that is supported by an HCA not only depends on the HCA
> firmware but also on the number of completion vectors a HCA could
> allocate during driver initialization. The number of MSI-X vectors
> available on an x86-64 system is limited (224). Dual-socket x86-64
> motherboards with up to 11 PCIe slots are available commercially. If
> all PCIe-slots are populated it's almost sure that one of the PCIe
> cards won't be assigned as many MSI-X vectors as it could use.
>
> Sorry but I'm not convinced that using the same completion vector mask
> for all HCA's and all processes is a good idea. Or is there perhaps
> something I have overlooked ?
>
> Bart.
Hi Bart,
I agree with your suggestions - working on the revised patch
accordingly.
Thank You.
- Sreedhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-09 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-05 13:18 [PATCH v2 3/4] rsockets: distribute completion queue vectors among multiple cores Sreedhar Kodali
[not found] ` <f028f54b9900ee34fcd1abd1d90d10e6-FJGp5E75HVmZamtmwQBW5tBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-05 15:47 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <5409DB0D.6080103-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-06 3:06 ` Sreedhar Kodali
[not found] ` <850a2835b5917f6da62af3d1ea0288fd-FJGp5E75HVmZamtmwQBW5tBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-08 6:47 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <540D50E9.5050709-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-08 14:27 ` Sreedhar Kodali
[not found] ` <a8ac21f3c9d7c802ab089bc0d432e40b-FJGp5E75HVmZamtmwQBW5tBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-08 18:22 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <540DF3CC.1060304-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-09 12:28 ` Sreedhar Kodali [this message]
[not found] ` <edc2b05703209d2a7626a31abb170ceb-FJGp5E75HVmZamtmwQBW5tBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-11 12:34 ` Sreedhar Kodali
[not found] ` <ef556922e7b766360a38df904dff1c70-FJGp5E75HVmZamtmwQBW5tBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-15 9:06 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <5416ABFB.7040701-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-16 4:33 ` Sreedhar Kodali
[not found] ` <d5804c38cb47bcc79eb3962cf8ca6989-FJGp5E75HVmZamtmwQBW5tBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-16 4:57 ` Hefty, Sean
[not found] ` <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A8237399DD3DA8-P5GAC/sN6hkd3b2yrw5b5LfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-17 5:54 ` Sreedhar Kodali
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=edc2b05703209d2a7626a31abb170ceb@imap.linux.ibm.com \
--to=srkodali-23vcf4htsmix0ybbhkvfkdbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pradeeps-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.