Re: Re: adding ba_policy member in drv_ampdu_action op - request information

[vivekanandah@posedge.com]

hi johannes,

i agree on that count :)

thanks and regards
Vivek





On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:40:05 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 02:39 -0800, vivekanandah@posedge.com wrote:
>
>> is'nt the station's capability and the AP capability intersected 
>> during
>> association? i always thought that the comment was mis-represented.
>>
>> i did a small test and i see that the stations capability is 
>> actually
>> the subset of AP capabilities that both support.
>> if that is the case, then we do not have to check for the capability
>> independently there! do i miss something in my understanding?
>>
>> also, if what i have stated above is correct, then yes, i feel 
>> delayed
>> block ack as a feature might need to be implemented on mac80211 and 
>> then
>> check for the same.
>
> I don't see what difference that makes? You still have to implement 
> the
> feature fully, we don't have support for it at all.
>
> johannes
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html