From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [IMA] 11b771ffff: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_kernel/locking/mutex.c
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 10:37:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee98e3a4-8664-ea20-dd9a-eff5edbe8a9e@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1577725301.5874.32.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On 12/30/19 9:01 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
Hi Mimi,
> Hi Lakshmi,
>
> On Fri, 2019-12-27 at 22:23 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> [ 333.455345] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:281
>> [ 333.457243] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 12395, name: userfaultfd
>> [ 333.458888] CPU: 1 PID: 12395 Comm: userfaultfd Not tainted 5.5.0-rc1-00011-g11b771ffff8fc #1
>> [ 333.461096] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
>> [ 333.463893] Call Trace:
>> [ 333.465287] <IRQ>
>> [ 333.466351] dump_stack+0x66/0x8b
>> [ 333.467346] ___might_sleep+0x102/0x120
>> [ 333.468385] mutex_lock+0x1c/0x40
>> [ 333.469421] ima_process_queued_keys+0x24/0x110
>> [ 333.470529] ? ima_process_queued_keys+0x110/0x110
>> [ 333.471656] call_timer_fn+0x2d/0x140
>> [ 333.472707] run_timer_softirq+0x46f/0x4b0
>> [ 333.473752] ? enqueue_hrtimer+0x39/0xa0
>> [ 333.474780] __do_softirq+0xe3/0x2f8
>> [ 333.475768] irq_exit+0xd5/0xe0
>> [ 333.476738] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x74/0x140
>> [ 333.477834] apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20
>> [ 333.478858] </IRQ>
>
> I think this is an instance where defining timer_expired as atomic and
> then testing it using atomic_dec_and_test() would help. Either the
> queued keys would be deleted in ima_timer_handler() or measured in
> ima_process_queued_keys().
>
> Mimi
Would it be better to use a spinlock (instead of a mutex) to synchronize
access to the queued keys list? That would work for timer callback
function also.
Before submitting the patch for freeing the keys I had tested the case
where queued keys are freed in timer callback. But I did not hit the
above break.
I will follow the steps given by Rong and validate the fix.
thanks,
-lakshmi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-30 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-27 14:23 [IMA] 11b771ffff: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_kernel/locking/mutex.c kernel test robot
2019-12-27 14:23 ` kernel test robot
2019-12-30 17:01 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-12-30 18:37 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian [this message]
2019-12-30 21:14 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-01-04 11:49 ` Chen, Rong A
2020-01-04 11:49 ` Chen, Rong A
2020-01-04 18:46 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ee98e3a4-8664-ea20-dd9a-eff5edbe8a9e@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.