From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] stackleak: Disable ftrace for stackleak.c References: <1541887530-16610-1-git-send-email-alex.popov@linux.com> <20181110183011.2290fc20@gandalf.local.home> From: Alexander Popov Message-ID: Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 13:19:45 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181110183011.2290fc20@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Steven Rostedt Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, Kees Cook , Jann Horn , Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , Joerg Roedel , Borislav Petkov , Thomas Gleixner , Dave Hansen , Peter Zijlstra , Jan Kara , Mathieu Desnoyers , Dan Williams , Masahiro Yamada , Masami Hiramatsu , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11.11.2018 2:30, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 01:05:30 +0300 > Alexander Popov wrote: > >> The stackleak_erase() function is called on the trampoline stack at the >> end of syscall. This stack is not big enough for ftrace operations, >> e.g. it can be overflowed if we enable kprobe_events for stackleak_erase(). > > Is the issue with kprobes or with function tracing? Because this stops > function tracing which I only want disabled if function tracing itself > is an issue, not for other things that may use the function tracing > infrastructure. Hello Steven, I believe that stackleak erasing is not compatible with function tracing itself. That's what the kernel testing robot has hit: https://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2018/11/09/1 I used kprobe_events just to reproduce the problem: https://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2018/11/09/4 Best regards, Alexander