All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhuoying Cai <zycai@linux.ibm.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: jrossi@linux.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com,
	richard.henderson@linaro.org, david@kernel.org,
	walling@linux.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.ibm.com,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
	mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, iii@linux.ibm.com, eblake@redhat.com,
	armbru@redhat.com, alifm@linux.ibm.com, brueckner@linux.ibm.com,
	pierrick.bouvier@oss.qualcomm.com, jdaley@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 26/35] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add additional security checks for secure boot
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 16:47:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <efefd0a4-e40e-4555-9e1b-5cdd1edb55c5@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2648e0272c9a8b9d5c5667a85a303f63b54ecb3a.camel@linux.ibm.com>

Thanks for the review!

On 7/2/26 12:08 PM, Eric Farman wrote:
> On Wed, 2026-07-01 at 16:49 -0400, Zhuoying Cai wrote:
>> Add additional checks to ensure that components do not overlap with
>> signed components when loaded into memory.
>>
>> Add additional checks to ensure the load addresses of unsigned components
>> are greater than or equal to 0x2000.
>>
>> When the secure IPL code loading attributes facility (SCLAF) is installed,
>> all signed components must contain a secure code loading attributes block
>> (SCLAB).
>>
>> The SCLAB provides further validation of information on where to load the
>> signed binary code from the load device, and where to start the execution
>> of the loaded OS code.
>>
>> When SCLAF is installed, its content must be evaluated during secure IPL.
>>
>> Add IPL Information Error Indicators (IIEI) and Component Error
>> Indicators (CEI) for IPL Information Report Block (IIRB).
>>
>> When SCLAF is installed, additional secure boot checks are performed
>> during zipl and store results of verification into IIRB.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhuoying Cai <zycai@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  include/hw/s390x/ipl/qipl.h   |  29 +++++-
>>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/sclp.h       |   1 +
>>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/secure-ipl.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/secure-ipl.h |  51 ++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 246 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>

[...]

>> +static void check_sclab(SclaBlock **global_sclab,
>> +                        IplDeviceComponentEntry *comp_entry,
>> +                        IplInfoBlockHeader *comp_list_hdr)
>> +{
>> +    SclabOriginLocator *sclab_locator;
>> +    SclaBlock *sclab;
>> +
>> +    /* sclab locator is located at the last 8 bytes of the signed comp */
>> +    sclab_locator = (SclabOriginLocator *)(comp_entry->addr +
>> +                                           comp_entry->len - 8);
> 
> Need to verify that len >=8, otherwise who knows what gets read.
> 
>> +
>> +    /* return early if sclab does not exist */
>> +    zipl_secure_validate(magic_match(sclab_locator->magic, ZIPL_MAGIC),
>> +                         &comp_entry->cei, S390_CEI_INVALID_SCLAB,
>> +                         "Magic does not match. SCLAB does not exist");
>> +
>> +    if (comp_entry->cei & S390_CEI_INVALID_SCLAB) {
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    zipl_secure_validate(sclab_locator->len >= S390_SCLAB_MIN_LEN, &comp_entry->cei,
>> +                         S390_CEI_INVALID_SCLAB_LEN | S390_CEI_INVALID_SCLAB,
>> +                         "Invalid SCLAB length");
>> +
>> +    /* return early if sclab is invalid */
>> +    if (comp_entry->cei & S390_CEI_INVALID_SCLAB) {
>> +        return;
>> +    }
> 
> I get why these two conditions (missing/invalid SCLAB) cause us to stop processing when in audit
> mode...
> 
>> +
>> +    sclab = (SclaBlock *)(comp_entry->addr + comp_entry->len -
>> +                          sclab_locator->len);
>> +
>> +    zipl_secure_validate(sclab->format == 0, &comp_entry->cei,
>> +                         S390_CEI_INVALID_SCLAB_FORMAT,
>> +                         "Format-0 SCLAB is not being used");
> 
> ...but why doesn't this one (SCLAB format)? Do the subsequent flags checks all apply regardless of
> format?
> 

Continuing with the flag checks seems reasonable to me, since we're
still dealing with some form of valid SCLAB. Please let me know your
thoughts. Thanks!

>> +
>> +    if (!(sclab->flags & S390_SCLAB_OPSW)) {
>> +        /* OPSW = 0 - Load PSW field in SCLAB must contain zeros */
>> +        zipl_secure_validate(sclab->load_psw == 0, &comp_entry->cei,
>> +                             S390_CEI_SCLAB_LOAD_PSW_NOT_ZERO,
>> +                             "Load PSW is not zero when Override PSW bit is zero");
>> +    } else {
>> +        /* OPSW = 1 indicating global SCLAB */
>> +        if (*global_sclab) {
>> +            comp_list_hdr->iiei |= S390_IIEI_MORE_GLOBAL_SCLAB;
>> +            zipl_secure_error("More than one global SCLAB");
>> +        }
>> +        *global_sclab = sclab;
>> +
>> +        /* override load address flag must set to one */
>> +        zipl_secure_validate(sclab->flags & S390_SCLAB_OLA, &comp_entry->cei,
>> +                             S390_CEI_SCLAB_OLA_NOT_ONE,
>> +                             "OLA flag is not set to one in the global SCLAB");
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (!(sclab->flags & S390_SCLAB_OLA)) {
>> +        /* OLA = 0 - Load address field in SCLAB must contain zeros */
>> +        zipl_secure_validate(sclab->load_addr == 0, &comp_entry->cei,
>> +                             S390_CEI_SCLAB_LOAD_ADDR_NOT_ZERO,
>> +                             "Load Address is not zero when OLA flag is zero");
>> +    } else {
>> +        /* OLA = 1 - Load address field must match storage address of the component */
>> +        zipl_secure_validate(sclab->load_addr == comp_entry->addr, &comp_entry->cei,
>> +                             S390_CEI_UNMATCHED_SCLAB_LOAD_ADDR,
>> +                             "Load Address does not match with component load address");
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    zipl_secure_validate(~sclab->flags & S390_SCLAB_NUC || sclab->flags & S390_SCLAB_OPSW,
>> +                         &comp_entry->cei, S390_CEI_NUC_NOT_IN_GLOBAL_SCLAB,
>> +                         "NUC bit is set, but not in the global SCLAB");
>> +
>> +    zipl_secure_validate(~sclab->flags & S390_SCLAB_SC || sclab->flags & S390_SCLAB_OPSW,
>> +                         &comp_entry->cei, S390_CEI_SC_NOT_IN_GLOBAL_SCLAB,
>> +                         "SC bit is set, but not in the global SCLAB");
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int zipl_load_signature(ComponentEntry *entry, uint64_t sig)
>>  {
>>      if (entry->compdat.sig_info.format != DER_SIGNATURE_FORMAT) {
>> @@ -268,6 +415,8 @@ int zipl_run_secure(ComponentEntry **entry_ptr, uint8_t *tmp_sec,
>>      uint8_t *tmp_buf;
>>      bool verified;
>>      bool signed_found = false;
>> +    bool sclab_found = false;
>> +    SclaBlock *global_sclab = NULL;
>>  
>>      if ((MAX_SIGNED_COMP * CERT_BUF_MAX_LEN) > (CERT_BUF_SIZE)) {
>>          panic("Not enough memory to store certificates");
>> @@ -308,6 +457,10 @@ int zipl_run_secure(ComponentEntry **entry_ptr, uint8_t *tmp_sec,
>>  
>>              /* no signature present (unsigned component) */
>>              if (!sig_entry.len) {
>> +                zipl_secure_validate(comp_entry.addr >= S390_UNSIGNED_MIN_ADDR,
>> +                            &comp_entry.cei, S390_CEI_INVALID_UNSIGNED_ADDR,
>> +                            "Load address for unsigned component is less than 0x2000");
>> +
>>                  comp_list_add(comp_list, comp_entry);
>>                  break;
>>              }
>> @@ -319,6 +472,9 @@ int zipl_run_secure(ComponentEntry **entry_ptr, uint8_t *tmp_sec,
>>              comp_entry.flags = S390_IPL_DEV_COMP_FLAG_SC;
>>              signed_found = true;
>>  
>> +            check_sclab(&global_sclab, &comp_entry, &comp_list->ipl_info_header);
>> +            sclab_found |= !(comp_entry.cei & S390_CEI_INVALID_SCLAB);
>> +
>>              cert_entry = (IplSignatureCertificateEntry) { 0 };
>>              verified = verify_signature(comp_entry, sig_entry,
>>                                          &cert_entry.len, &cert_table_idx);
>> @@ -364,9 +520,17 @@ int zipl_run_secure(ComponentEntry **entry_ptr, uint8_t *tmp_sec,
>>          }
>>      }
>>  
>> -    if (!signed_found) {
>> -        zipl_secure_error("Secure boot is on, but components are not signed");
>> -    }
>> +    zipl_secure_validate(signed_found, &comp_list->ipl_info_header.iiei,
>> +                         S390_IIEI_NO_SIGNED_COMP,
>> +                         "Secure boot is on, but components are not signed");
>> +
>> +    zipl_secure_validate(sclab_found, &comp_list->ipl_info_header.iiei,
>> +                         S390_IIEI_NO_SCLAB, "No recognizable SCLAB");
>> +
>> +    comp_entry = (IplDeviceComponentEntry){ 0 };
>> +    comp_entry.addr = entry->compdat.load_psw;
>> +    check_global_sclab(global_sclab, &comp_entry, comp_list);
>> +    comp_list_add(comp_list, comp_entry);
> 
> Do we actually need to add an (empty) entry when global_sclab wasn't found?
> 

I think we should still add this entry even when global_sclab is not
found, since the comp_entry would still contain the PSW value from the
EXEC entry.

>>  
>>      *entry_ptr = entry;
>>      free((void *)sig_entry.addr);
>> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/secure-ipl.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/secure-ipl.h
>> index 1b1287858b..1bacb4987a 100644
>> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/secure-ipl.h
>> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/secure-ipl.h
>> @@ -27,6 +27,33 @@ int zipl_run_secure(ComponentEntry **entry_ptr, uint8_t *tmp_sec,
>>                      IplSignatureCertificateList *cert_list,
>>                      uint8_t **tmp_cert_buf);
>>  
>> +#define S390_SCLAB_OPSW    0x8000   /* override PSW flag */
>> +#define S390_SCLAB_OLA     0x4000   /* override load address flag */
>> +#define S390_SCLAB_NUC     0x2000   /* no unsigned components flag */
>> +#define S390_SCLAB_SC      0x1000   /* single component flag */
>> +
>> +#define S390_SCLAB_MIN_LEN      32
>> +#define S390_UNSIGNED_MIN_ADDR  0x2000
>> +
>> +/* Secure Code Loading Attributes Block */
>> +struct SclaBlock {
>> +    uint8_t  format;
>> +    uint8_t  reserved1;
>> +    uint16_t flags;
>> +    uint8_t  reserved2[4];
>> +    uint64_t load_psw;
>> +    uint64_t load_addr;
>> +    uint64_t reserved3[];
>> +} __attribute__ ((packed));
>> +typedef struct SclaBlock SclaBlock;
>> +
>> +struct SclabOriginLocator {
>> +    uint8_t reserved[2];
>> +    uint16_t len;
>> +    uint8_t magic[4];
>> +} __attribute__ ((packed));
>> +typedef struct SclabOriginLocator SclabOriginLocator;
>> +
>>  static inline void zipl_secure_error(const char *message)
>>  {
>>      switch (boot_mode) {
>> @@ -38,6 +65,30 @@ static inline void zipl_secure_error(const char *message)
>>      }
>>  }
>>  
>> +static inline void zipl_secure_validate_u16(bool condition, uint16_t *flags,
>> +                                            uint16_t flag, const char *message)
>> +{
>> +    if (!condition) {
>> +        *flags |= flag;
>> +        zipl_secure_error(message);
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void zipl_secure_validate_u32(bool condition, uint32_t *flags,
>> +                                            uint32_t flag, const char *message)
>> +{
>> +    if (!condition) {
>> +        *flags |= flag;
>> +        zipl_secure_error(message);
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define zipl_secure_validate(condition, flags, flag, message)   \
>> +    _Generic((flags),                                           \
>> +        uint16_t * : zipl_secure_validate_u16,                  \
>> +        uint32_t * : zipl_secure_validate_u32                   \
>> +    )(condition, flags, flag, message)
>> +
>>  static inline uint64_t _diag320(void *data, unsigned long subcode)
>>  {
>>      register unsigned long addr asm("0") = (unsigned long)data;



  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-02 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-01 20:48 [PATCH v12 00/35] Secure IPL Support for SCSI Scheme of virtio-blk/virtio-scsi Devices Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-01 20:48 ` [PATCH v12 01/35] Add boot-certs to s390-ccw-virtio machine type option Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-01 23:30   ` Jared Rossi
2026-07-02  0:47     ` Matthew Rosato
2026-07-02 17:12       ` Matthew Rosato
2026-07-01 20:48 ` [PATCH v12 02/35] crypto/x509-utils: Refactor with GNUTLS fallback Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-01 20:48 ` [PATCH v12 03/35] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for certificate store Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-01 20:48 ` [PATCH v12 04/35] hw/s390x/ipl: Create " Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02  0:41   ` Jared Rossi
2026-07-01 20:48 ` [PATCH v12 05/35] s390x/diag: Introduce DIAG 320 for Certificate Store Facility Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-01 20:48 ` [PATCH v12 06/35] s390x/diag: Refactor address validation check from diag308_parm_check Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-01 20:48 ` [PATCH v12 07/35] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 320 subcode 1 Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02  3:52   ` Eric Farman
2026-07-01 20:48 ` [PATCH v12 08/35] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for DIAG 320 subcode 2 Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-01 20:48 ` [PATCH v12 09/35] s390x/diag: Implement " Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-01 23:29   ` Matthew Rosato
2026-07-02  3:41   ` Eric Farman
2026-07-01 20:48 ` [PATCH v12 10/35] hw/s390x: Define finite size for single entry VCEntry Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02  1:02   ` Matthew Rosato
2026-07-02  3:54     ` Eric Farman
2026-07-01 20:48 ` [PATCH v12 11/35] s390x/diag: Introduce DIAG 508 for secure IPL operations Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-01 20:48 ` [PATCH v12 12/35] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for DIAG 508 subcode 1 Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-01 20:48 ` [PATCH v12 13/35] s390x/diag: generalize s390_ipl_read/write to accept void * Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02  1:30   ` Jared Rossi
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 14/35] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 508 subcode 1 for signature verification Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 15/35] s390x/ipl: Introduce IPL Information Report Block (IIRB) Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02  1:39   ` Jared Rossi
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 16/35] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Define memory for IPLB and convert IPLB to pointers Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02  1:42   ` Jared Rossi
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 17/35] hw/s390x/ipl: Add IPIB flags to IPL Parameter Block Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02  1:47   ` Jared Rossi
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 18/35] hw/s390x/ipl: Rework s390_ipl_map_iplb_chain for certificate storage Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02 14:56   ` Eric Farman
2026-07-02 15:38     ` Jared Rossi
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 19/35] s390x: Guest support for Secure-IPL Facility Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 20/35] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Refactor zipl_run() Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 21/35] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Rework zipl_load_segment function Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02  1:58   ` Jared Rossi
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 22/35] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Introduce ZiplBootMode enum for IPL mode selection Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02  2:01   ` Jared Rossi
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 23/35] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add signature verification for secure IPL in audit mode Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02  4:08   ` Eric Farman
2026-07-02 14:13   ` Jared Rossi
2026-07-02 15:26     ` Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02 16:11       ` Jared Rossi
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 24/35] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add signed component address overlap checks Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02  2:49   ` Jared Rossi
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 25/35] s390x: Guest support for Secure-IPL Code Loading Attributes Facility (SCLAF) Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 26/35] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add additional security checks for secure boot Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02 16:08   ` Eric Farman
2026-07-02 20:47     ` Zhuoying Cai [this message]
2026-07-03  2:27       ` Eric Farman
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 27/35] Add secure-boot to s390-ccw-virtio machine type option Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 28/35] hw/s390x/ipl: Set IPIB flags for secure IPL Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02  3:16   ` Jared Rossi
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 29/35] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Handle true secure IPL mode Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 30/35] hw/s390x/ipl: Handle secure boot with multiple boot devices Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 31/35] hw/s390x/ipl: Handle secure boot without specifying a boot device Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02  3:28   ` Jared Rossi
2026-07-02 21:15     ` Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 32/35] s390x/ipl: re-apply secure boot flags on DIAG 308 reboot Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02  3:47   ` Jared Rossi
2026-07-02 17:25     ` Jason J. Herne
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 33/35] tests/functional/s390x: Add secure IPL functional test Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02  1:48   ` Matthew Rosato
2026-07-02 15:38     ` Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02 16:06       ` Matthew Rosato
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 34/35] docs/specs: Add secure IPL documentation Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02  2:54   ` Matthew Rosato
2026-07-01 20:49 ` [PATCH v12 35/35] docs/system/s390x: " Zhuoying Cai
2026-07-02  3:06   ` Matthew Rosato

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=efefd0a4-e40e-4555-9e1b-5cdd1edb55c5@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=zycai@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=brueckner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jdaley@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jrossi@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pierrick.bouvier@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=walling@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.