From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Danny Milosavljevic" Subject: Re: Which version will be merged into mainline kernel? Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:17:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <194f62550610160250u265ef120lee3cf9a17266939f@mail.gmail.com> <454A596F.8070909@namesys.com> <194f62550611072321j1cd34205u55f3c121dcac7aac@mail.gmail.com> <200611081015.14320.biscani@pd.astro.it> <20061108102136.GS6012@schatzie.adilger.int> <4557E254.5060404@netvigator.com> <45582353.3070709@slaphack.com> <45583C43.5070904@netvigator.com> Reply-To: danny.milo@scratchpost.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Sender: news List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hi, On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:34:59 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: > David Masover wrote: >> Christopher Chan wrote: > [...smartdrv...] Yeah, smartdrv was nice :) [...] > Try arguing why you lost thousands of mails when the box crashed and > justifying it. Oh. Good point. So the bad case is: 1. mails are tiny 2. RAM cache is big 3. cache doesn't get flushed to disk for 1000s of mails 4. crash happens seldomly, but severely :) -> 1000s of mail lost by the crash Now I see :) cheers, Danny