From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H1jqQ-0006JN-TU for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:38:22 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H1jpJ-0003bJ-Vz for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:37:13 +0100 Received: from r776d.r.ppp-pool.de ([89.54.119.109]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:37:13 +0100 Received: from no2spam by r776d.r.ppp-pool.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:37:13 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Rolf Leggewie Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:36:56 +0100 Message-ID: References: <459A4C53.3090401@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r776d.r.ppp-pool.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061115) In-Reply-To: <459A4C53.3090401@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> Sender: news Subject: Re: [RFC] code sprints or focus-weeks X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:38:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Koen Kooi wrote: > Looking at the development of OE the last year it seems that major improvements were > either sponsored (o-hand dudes, google SoC) or by people with supernatural focus (Holger). good time to step back and take a look at HOW things are getting done. > what do you think? I think this is a great idea. I hope you do not mind if I add another; Set up a good system for accepting bounties. OE is getting more and more widely used, I think there would be some revenue there. I believe it might make sense to use an external site/tool for managing the bounties or at least learn from how they process it. What do you think?