From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H2VtJ-0002CL-3e for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:56:33 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H2Vry-00038v-Js for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:55:10 +0100 Received: from r7782.r.ppp-pool.de ([89.54.119.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:55:10 +0100 Received: from no2spam by r7782.r.ppp-pool.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:55:10 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Rolf Leggewie Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:54:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1167668309.5601.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <459B7067.3070202@gmx.net> <1167841321.13059.2.camel@fleuret> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: r7782.r.ppp-pool.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061115) In-Reply-To: <1167841321.13059.2.camel@fleuret> Sender: news Subject: Re: Reverse-engineering SD specs for collie X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:56:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Anthony and Patrik, great. Thank you. I made a little entry on the FAQ page at wiki.openzaurus.org shortly after sending out my mail. Maybe you want to commit to your pledge there as well. http://wiki.openzaurus.org/FAQ On a more general note, we should discuss about when the bounty shall be paid out. I made the current wording more strict to be on the safe side. Getting a patch into upstream kernel would of course be the ultimate goal, but I would be happy to pay even before that goal is achieved (for example if main devs accepted the patch into OE). This is something we need to discuss. I am somewhat inexperienced with bounties but I think having a clear and measurable goal is important both for the willingness of contributors to pledge and for devs to go ahead and do it. I wonder if there are any online tools one can use to manage the process better and increase visibility. A quick google hunt turned up the following: http://www.opensourcexperts.com/ https://launchpad.net/bounties/ http://bountycounty.org/ https://www.bountysource.com/ http://donorge.org/ Any comments? This is something of general interest for OE, I think.