From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hc4lZ-0007qe-8F for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:15:33 +0200 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hc4l4-00055E-Jh for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:15:02 +0200 Received: from p5483b2eb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.131.178.235]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:15:02 +0200 Received: from vjensen by p5483b2eb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:15:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Vitus Jensen Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:21:59 +0200 Message-ID: References: <461BB515.7030108@balister.org> <200704101902.04699.repvik@kynisk.com> <461BC751.4090606@balister.org> <200704101932.19318.repvik@kynisk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5483b2eb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de Sender: news Subject: Re: RFC: U-Boot package clean up X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:15:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Hi Øyvind! Øyvind Repvik wrote: > On Tuesday 10 April 2007 19:20, Philip Balister wrote: >> Øyvind Repvik wrote: >> > I think I moved uboot-utils away from the uboot-utils directory and >> > into u-boot. Either way, it's not quite done yet. I'll take a look at >> > them and remove whichever one is "wrong". ... > My strategy would be something like this: > > Remove 1.1.2 and 1.1.4 (unless someone uses them, of course) ... We are using u-boot 1.1.4 on our devices. So if it's not too much hassle I vote for keeping that version. Not that it's difficult to build it seperately but building an image with a different version than is used to boot it could lead to problems, couldn't it? Bye, Vitus