From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx02.optimcloud.com (mx02.optimcloud.com [46.23.93.22]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.13163.1603801701259238554 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 05:28:22 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=fail reason="no key for verify" header.i=@optimcloud.com header.s=obsd header.b=BZT10xt6; spf=none, err=SPF record not found (domain: optimcloud.com, ip: 46.23.93.22, mailfrom: dingo@optimcloud.com) Received: from mx02.optimcloud.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx02.optimcloud.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8b76bd63 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:28:19 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=optimcloud.com; h= subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type; s=obsd; bh=XmAaKL2HaUtly+COWGGVQZwjl4 VU0Df7PJ1ik8XR5+M=; b=BZT10xt6J8p/mzVS8tmz9Dfk+973anNRhwiDTziTJD n+QTWBiTaR5XDMiD+xZAf6YxT/bR6pCLBZedjQ54bnuGni+y3in+Z470UtkRwFQv 2IUkdsmy3UgplAQk6p5GceqSNo729OV1hLVtUExNPprGuyA4mVVf5cPXO639Twy2 iE335uEayKoiqvMf3I4XEpsC822Coo9PvtB4TX/C5D3FYHIBi77ElwsqKmNV4mbd 8fNq+Ww74VymzkvTvTvSOkzBQhGQep/tyKLyejZoIzCW8iKvQS9ZmI5HXq2cEZgf YwQ3vVJYLcJWILeaIxAZXoJYBX+hdRTylqQ3bwqSNulw== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=optimcloud.com; h=subject:to :references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-type; q=dns; s=obsd; b=lp7P4SG+qB9I0W3fwiIDwhj9+LO6x7T6 PqEbgDgEyzGDIhZcDwXuSKU466cKubMaLJl4UOs4krdj93znpbJpGvitu/Kbfi38 Saq03daF10USV8GNwWWYVMC09qFEJvfV1LkACYygWoZLGipYQ/tKne5A2bbvkiFB uBWLguDqgQuSPtxyyR3yU8TkPpxyaQzueXZxRD4pUcWrSo1cN7v4TLNkbun+SfDD 9xXAmsW8P5AUmz3AH2kOuoTK5dPpKQHaD11rxz/fzNC1Ypy9/oEwaRXIsHoQUaYE 8ovFAHPfAgriN0tQpK8ros8sFhU7novmn1HS1ZWXryR+QbndX4QIQA== Received: by mx02.optimcloud.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 5d0dfb54 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) auth=yes user=support@optimcloud.com for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:28:18 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [meta-virtualization] is meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack useable, or a WIP ? To: meta-virtualization@lists.yoctoproject.org References: From: "Dingo" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:28:15 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------23095E870DDD45187942DA16" Content-Language: en-US --------------23095E870DDD45187942DA16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/27/20 7:07 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 5:16 AM Yocto wrote: >> okay reading the doc README it states >> >> There are six openstack layers that are used to build a controller/compute >> node image pair. The dependencies of these layers are also required for a >> build, and are listed in the layers themselves. >> >> - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack >> - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-compute-deploy >> - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-controller-deploy >> - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-qemu >> - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-compute-test-config >> - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-controller-test-config >> >> so the question is, is this actually usable to bitbake openstack based images ? or a Work in progress ? >> > They are now a work in progress. They *worked*, but we didn't have a > dedicated maintainer, so we make sure the re-usable recipes work (and > a few have migrated to the main meta-virt over time), but to build and > deploy working controller and compute nodes, they wouldn't be usable > out of the box. > > Bruce So they need updating, maintaining, i see alot of python2 and python3 mixed in here. guess they would have to be gone through one by one to get it back to functional. Ill take a look. > >> >> > > > > --------------23095E870DDD45187942DA16 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


On 10/27/20 7:07 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 5:16 AM Yocto <yocto@optimcloud.com> wrote:

okay reading the doc README it states

There are six openstack layers that are used to build a controller/compute
node image pair. The dependencies of these layers are also required for a
build, and are listed in the layers themselves.

   - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack
   - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-compute-deploy
   - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-controller-deploy
   - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-qemu
   - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-compute-test-config
   - meta-cloud-services/meta-openstack-controller-test-config

so the question is, is this actually usable to bitbake openstack based images ? or a Work in progress ?


They are now a work in progress. They *worked*, but we didn't have a
dedicated maintainer, so we make sure the re-usable recipes work (and
a few have migrated to the main meta-virt over time), but to build and
deploy working controller and compute nodes, they wouldn't be usable
out of the box.

Bruce

So they need updating, maintaining, i see alot of python2 and python3 mixed in here.

guess they would have to be gone through one by one to get it back to functional.

Ill take a look.
--------------23095E870DDD45187942DA16--