From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iproute2 - one line mode should be deprecated?
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 11:55:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f11a6a89-8fef-e67a-7d54-0058dee84b0b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw56DJKuP+yVim4Hq8UJs9gMJgew_4czNNW+obL3WZ7puA@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/9/22 11:16 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> I'm terribly old-fashioned myself and still use one-line mode, and the
> kinds of scripts I use still use awk. I may be the last one standing
> here...
>
I use oneline a lot as well for a quick list of netdevs and network
addresses.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-09 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-09 18:13 iproute2 - one line mode should be deprecated? Stephen Hemminger
2022-12-09 18:16 ` Dave Taht
2022-12-09 18:55 ` David Ahern [this message]
2022-12-10 15:28 ` Francois Romieu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f11a6a89-8fef-e67a-7d54-0058dee84b0b@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.