From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@bugseng.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper3 <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Roger Pau <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
Consulting <consulting@bugseng.com>,
Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: MISRA C Rule 5.3 violation - shadowing in mctelem.c
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 15:42:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f14f15ad-7d16-4bec-9edc-82956ccc7bb4@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f351f904fab43f88396b3ae1b5d64e95@bugseng.com>
On 19.06.2024 15:23, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> I was looking at the shadowing due to the struct identifier and the
> local variables "mctctl" in x86/cpu/mcheck/mctelem.c (see [1], the
> second report). This kind of shadowing seems very intentional, and the
> initial naive approach I devised was to simply rename the local
> variables.
> This, however, results in build breakages, as sometimes the shadowed
> name seems to be used for accessing the global struct (unless I'm
> missing something), and as a result changing the name of the locals is
> not possible, at least not without further modifications to this file,
> which aren't obvious to me.
>
> It would be really helpful if you could point me to either:
> - avoid the shadowing in some way that does not occur to me at the
> moment;
Could you please be more specific about the issues you encountered? I
hope you don't expect everyone reading this request of yours to (try to)
redo what you did. The only thing I could vaguely guess is that maybe
you went a little too far with the renaming. Plus, just from looking at
the grep output, did you try to simply move down the file scope variable?
It looks like all shadowing instances are ahead of any uses of the
variable (but I may easily be overlooking an important line contradicting
that pattern).
> - deviate this file, as many similar files in x86/cpu are already
> deviated.
I question the presence of these in those files. They were apparently all
added when the files were introduced, and said commit - from Simone, acked
by Stefano - came with no justification at all.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-19 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-19 13:23 MISRA C Rule 5.3 violation - shadowing in mctelem.c Nicola Vetrini
2024-06-19 13:42 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2024-06-20 16:40 ` Nicola Vetrini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f14f15ad-7d16-4bec-9edc-82956ccc7bb4@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=consulting@bugseng.com \
--cc=nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=simone.ballarin@bugseng.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.