Re: [PATCH 04/10] x86/tdx: Make macros of TDCALLs consistent with the spec

[Nikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com>]

On 12.07.23 г. 11:55 ч., Kai Huang wrote:
> The TDX spec names all TDCALLs with prefix "TDG".  Currently, the kernel
> doesn't follow such convention for the macros of those TDCALLs but uses
> prefix "TDX_" for all of them.  Although it's arguable whether the TDX
> spec names those TDCALLs properly, it's better for the kernel to follow
> the spec when naming those macros.
> 
> Change all macros of TDCALLs to make them consistent with the spec.  As
> a bonus, they get distinguished easily from the host-side SEAMCALLs,
> which all have prefix "TDH".
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
> index 5b8056f6c83f..de021df92009 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
> @@ -15,11 +15,11 @@
>   #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>   
>   /* TDX module Call Leaf IDs */
> -#define TDX_GET_INFO			1
> -#define TDX_GET_VEINFO			3
> -#define TDX_GET_REPORT			4
> -#define TDX_ACCEPT_PAGE			6
> -#define TDX_WR				8
> +#define TDG_VP_INFO			1
> +#define TDG_VP_VEINFO_GET		3
> +#define TDG_MR_REPORT			4
> +#define TDG_MEM_PAGE_ACCEPT		6
> +#define TDG_VM_WR			8
>   
What branch is this patch set based off? Because the existing TDX_GET_* 
defines are in arch/x86/include/asm/shared/tdx.h due to ff40b5769a50f ?


<snip>