From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: block dangerous passthrough operation
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 06:48:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f22696cb-eefb-66fd-9062-c91fd2800669@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3UL2LER7I9KUxGW@kbusch-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
> There's nothing preventing a vendor specific command from being just as
> destructive either, but you can't realistically fence those off either.
> I've always said the driver should not police this user interface as
> that inevitably gets in the way of its flexibility.
>
The list will grow over time and we'll have to deal with all sorts of
patches/spec modifications and even if we all do that as mentioned
earlier I don't see any way to block Vendor specific commands ...
-ck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-17 6:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20221116130636epcas5p39a586e15d27045752f18d022f4efd74a@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2022-11-16 13:01 ` block dangerous passthrough operation Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-16 13:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] nvme: return an errno from nvme_cmd_allowed Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-16 13:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] nvme: don't allow user space to send fabrics commands Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-16 13:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] nvme: don't allow userspace to set the Host Behavior Support feature Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-16 13:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] nvme: reject passthrough of queue creation / deletion commands Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-16 13:25 ` block dangerous passthrough operation Kanchan Joshi
2022-11-16 13:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-16 13:43 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-11-16 15:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-17 3:13 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-11-21 7:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-16 16:12 ` Keith Busch
2022-11-17 3:51 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-11-17 16:03 ` Keith Busch
2022-11-17 6:48 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2022-11-21 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-17 3:49 ` Jens Axboe
2022-11-21 7:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-21 15:35 ` Keith Busch
2022-11-22 6:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-22 10:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-11-22 12:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-22 15:11 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f22696cb-eefb-66fd-9062-c91fd2800669@nvidia.com \
--to=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.