From: "Spencer Ku (古世瑜)" <Spencer.Ku@quantatw.com>
To: "openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org" <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Current situation about IPv6
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 08:21:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f265f52bb0c14964ab663f4cd77e754d@quantatw.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 668 bytes --]
Hi Teams,
I am interesting about what is the current situation about IPv6.
Now I am trying to use ipmi command to get/set IPv6 settings, but I cannot get current result.
For example, ipmi command will response empty IPv6 address to me even if my environment is already having IPv6 address.
After that, I find a mail which is discussing about the IPv6 setting. And here is part of description from mail:
Ø Currently phosphor-networkd doesn't support SLAAC(DHCPV6, Router advertised address)
Does it mean that I need to set a special network environment without SLAAC and that can let IPv6 ipmi command work normally?
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Spencer
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 6396 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 6391 bytes --]
From: Ratan Gupta <ratagupt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org" <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Why IPv6AcceptRA is disabled in phosphor-network
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:01:17 +0000
Message-ID: <94f3de2f-f048-6fea-35c3-6b2b8d6d3239@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi David,
On 7/7/20 4:39 PM, David Wang (王振宇) wrote:
> Hi all,
> I want to set DHCPv6 to enable by default in my BMC.
> That is, I can delete /etc/systemd/network/00-bmc-eth*.network
> and reboot and still have DHCPv6 reachable.
>
> But I notice that IPv6AcceptRA is disabled in phosphor-network
> in order not to handle the ipv6 routing advertisement message periodically.
> See: https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/phosphor-networkd/+/8361
Currently phosphor-networkd doesn't support SLAAC(DHCPV6, Router
advertised address).
>
> Why we need to avoid handling RA periodically?
If you have bad router configured in network which keeps sending the
routing prefix frequently, phopshor-networkd frequently refreshing its
D-bus objects.It can be fixed as ignore the refreshing of the Dbus
objects if there is a D-bus object entry for the given IP address.
> Does it cause any bad effect?
> If I want to keep the acceptance RA, how should I configure it?
> Or should I just patch "IPv6AcceptRA=true" in phosphor-network of my BMC?
If we fix the behavior as suggested above there should not be a problem.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Regards,
> David
reply other threads:[~2020-08-07 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f265f52bb0c14964ab663f4cd77e754d@quantatw.com \
--to=spencer.ku@quantatw.com \
--cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.