* Current situation about IPv6
@ 2020-08-07 8:21 Spencer Ku (古世瑜)
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Spencer Ku (古世瑜) @ 2020-08-07 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 668 bytes --]
Hi Teams,
I am interesting about what is the current situation about IPv6.
Now I am trying to use ipmi command to get/set IPv6 settings, but I cannot get current result.
For example, ipmi command will response empty IPv6 address to me even if my environment is already having IPv6 address.
After that, I find a mail which is discussing about the IPv6 setting. And here is part of description from mail:
Ø Currently phosphor-networkd doesn't support SLAAC(DHCPV6, Router advertised address)
Does it mean that I need to set a special network environment without SLAAC and that can let IPv6 ipmi command work normally?
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Spencer
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 6396 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 6391 bytes --]
From: Ratan Gupta <ratagupt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org" <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Why IPv6AcceptRA is disabled in phosphor-network
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:01:17 +0000
Message-ID: <94f3de2f-f048-6fea-35c3-6b2b8d6d3239@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi David,
On 7/7/20 4:39 PM, David Wang (王振宇) wrote:
> Hi all,
> I want to set DHCPv6 to enable by default in my BMC.
> That is, I can delete /etc/systemd/network/00-bmc-eth*.network
> and reboot and still have DHCPv6 reachable.
>
> But I notice that IPv6AcceptRA is disabled in phosphor-network
> in order not to handle the ipv6 routing advertisement message periodically.
> See: https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/phosphor-networkd/+/8361
Currently phosphor-networkd doesn't support SLAAC(DHCPV6, Router
advertised address).
>
> Why we need to avoid handling RA periodically?
If you have bad router configured in network which keeps sending the
routing prefix frequently, phopshor-networkd frequently refreshing its
D-bus objects.It can be fixed as ignore the refreshing of the Dbus
objects if there is a D-bus object entry for the given IP address.
> Does it cause any bad effect?
> If I want to keep the acceptance RA, how should I configure it?
> Or should I just patch "IPv6AcceptRA=true" in phosphor-network of my BMC?
If we fix the behavior as suggested above there should not be a problem.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Regards,
> David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-08-07 8:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-08-07 8:21 Current situation about IPv6 Spencer Ku (古世瑜)
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.