From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HnXef-0008Fk-BA for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Mon, 14 May 2007 12:19:49 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HnXci-0008ON-8c for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Mon, 14 May 2007 12:17:48 +0200 Received: from 212.17.245.151 ([212.17.245.151]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 12:17:48 +0200 Received: from no2spam by 212.17.245.151 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 12:17:48 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org From: Rolf Leggewie Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 12:16:37 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1179059149.5404.3.camel@cimmeria.hyboria> <464818E3.7090203@gmail.com> <24757045.20070514112558@gmail.com> <46482288.2040904@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.17.245.151 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) In-Reply-To: <46482288.2040904@gmail.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: RFD: Bugzilla in general & bug triaging X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 10:19:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Junqian Gordon Xu wrote: >> As Rolf described in his mail, we do not reassign bugs in our >> workflow Actually that is neither what I wrote nor what I'd propose ;-) I have no issue with you assigning 2309 to yourself. You seem to take good care of it. > One benefit of reassigning the bug to myself is that I can click the "My > Bug" button and list all my filed and self-assigned bugs, instead of > remembering the bug number or relying on search. yes, very valid point. It innocently illustrates the kind of workflow I'd be looking for (and that I use to a certain degree for myself). You have a link with a search function saved in bugzilla and when you click on it all the bugs that need your attention or that you are interested in are right there. Gordon, maybe you want to save http://tinyurl.com/385p8b You could also separate that out to only list cc bugs or whatever suits your needs. Tweak it to your liking. Here are three searches that I use and deem useful for others http://tinyurl.com/2oypog (todays bugs: action: stay current) http://tinyurl.com/35l78g (bugs where compilation fails, action: verify) http://tinyurl.com/39gss8 (old with patches, action: inspect, commit)