From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FF54C61DB2 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 06:22:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B97281F0D; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 08:22:38 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="Jwdh67tx"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id E438682A0A; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 08:22:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lelvem-ot02.ext.ti.com (lelvem-ot02.ext.ti.com [198.47.23.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2808980FA8 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 08:22:34 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=m-shah@ti.com Received: from lelvem-sh02.itg.ti.com ([10.180.78.226]) by lelvem-ot02.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 5596MSEd689464; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 01:22:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1749450148; bh=Br6B/2hMreoZIGv1rguhjY3/9oupYb2fe+fjPft29s8=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=Jwdh67txAEsa3w/H7YSiToLHYoBtug7X5B9plK5UDEpp8Qhy7nQHAqmVsTXNwXWIC OYmUnI7ZXhsQDHtNmAw3yltblkAr0/i0unzC6efCZocfSrfvTnFnz8whhEFibVuO7Q l0AQEa8+ReodGRM53ouiyqXHZB9BE37zwvvptnuQ= Received: from DLEE103.ent.ti.com (dlee103.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.33]) by lelvem-sh02.itg.ti.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPS id 5596MSH91182604 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 9 Jun 2025 01:22:28 -0500 Received: from DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) by DLEE103.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 01:22:27 -0500 Received: from lelvem-mr05.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.9) by DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 01:22:27 -0500 Received: from [172.24.227.136] (moteen-ubuntu-desk.dhcp.ti.com [172.24.227.136] (may be forged)) by lelvem-mr05.itg.ti.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 5596MOjH959736; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 01:22:24 -0500 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 11:52:23 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v2] Propagate bootph-all and bootph-some-ram property to all supernodes To: CC: , , , , , , , References: <20250516114148.3862114-1-m-shah@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Moteen Shah In-Reply-To: <20250516114148.3862114-1-m-shah@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-C2ProcessedOrg: 333ef613-75bf-4e12-a4b1-8e3623f5dcea X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean Hello all, On 16/05/25 17:11, Moteen Shah wrote: > In the U-Boot pre-relocation stage, if the parent node lacks > bootph-all/bootph-some-ram property and the driver lacks a pre-reloc > flag, all of its subsequent subnodes gets skipped over from driver > binding—even if they have a bootph* property. > > This series addresses the issue by scanning through all the nodes during > build time and propagating the applicable property to all of its supernode. > > Changes since v1: > - Carry reviewed-by from Simon > - Add a subnode-4 in testcase > - Change commit message and comments in control.py > > Link to v1: > https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20250512115028.1783305-1-m-shah@ti.com/ > > Moteen Shah (2): > tools: binman: control.py: Propagate bootph-all/bootph-some-ram properties to supernodes > tools: binman: ftest.py: Add testcase for bootph-* propagation > > tools/binman/control.py | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tools/binman/ftest.py | 24 ++++++++++++ > tools/binman/test/347_bootph_prop.dts | 21 +++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 99 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tools/binman/test/347_bootph_prop.dts > A gentle ping on this. Does this series requires any further changes? Regards, Moteen