From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero-palau@amd.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Jonathan Cooper <jonathan.s.cooper@amd.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sfc: use IS_ENABLED() checks for CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:13:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f38d6b22-f846-5637-d58b-2d8862bc6840@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230217095650.2305559-1-arnd@kernel.org>
On 17/02/2023 09:56, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> One local variable has become unused after a recent change:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c: In function 'ef100_probe_netdev_pf':
> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_nic.c:1155:21: error: unused variable 'net_dev' [-Werror=unused-variable]
> struct net_device *net_dev = efx->net_dev;
> ^~~~~~~
>
> The variable is still used in an #ifdef. Replace the #ifdef with
> an if(IS_ENABLED()) check that lets the compiler see where it is
> used, rather than adding another #ifdef.
So we've had Leon telling us[1] to use __maybe_unused, and you're
saying to use IS_ENABLED() instead. Which is right?
(And does it make any difference to build time? I'm assuming the
compiler is smart enough that this change doesn't affect text
size...?)
-ed
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cac3fa89-50a3-6de0-796c-a215400f3710@intel.com/T/#md2ecc82f18c200391dc6581ff68ff08eee9a65cf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-17 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-17 9:56 [PATCH] sfc: use IS_ENABLED() checks for CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV Arnd Bergmann
2023-02-17 16:13 ` Edward Cree [this message]
2023-02-17 16:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-02-19 13:31 ` Simon Horman
2023-02-19 9:31 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-02-20 10:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f38d6b22-f846-5637-d58b-2d8862bc6840@gmail.com \
--to=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
--cc=alejandro.lucero-palau@amd.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathan.s.cooper@amd.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.