From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me, axboe@kernel.dk,
chaitanyak@nvidia.com
Cc: gjoyce@linux.ibm.com, elver@google.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::uuid
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 14:31:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3ab5d9d-cdf9-4e9c-b0ad-167cc88fdfef@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00124916-2b34-412b-afbb-04b91546478c@acm.org>
On 11/10/26 3:28 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/8/26 7:28 PM, Nilay Shroff wrote:
>> [ ... ]
>
> This patch breaks compilation in nvmet_ns_alloc() because uuid_gen(&ns->uuid)
> is called without holding subsys->lock. This is fixed only in patch 12.
> Please move patch 12 before patch 11 (or squash them).
The intention of this series is to first annotate a field in struct nvmet_ns
and then address any locking violations reported by the clang context analyzer
in a subsequent patch. I split the annotation and the corresponding locking
changes into separate patches to make the changes easier to review.
Also, since I haven't enabled CONTEXT_ANALYSIS:= y in the NVMe target Makefile yet,
enabling CONFIG_WARN_CONTEXT_ANALYSIS alone should not cause this compilation
failure.
> In nvmet_ns_device_uuid_show(), please use guard(mutex)(&ns->subsys->lock).
> Do you think using guard(...) is more appropriate then simple mutex_lock()
and mutex_unlock() APIs? I find using conventional mutex_lock()/mutex_unlcok()
APIs more readable and easy to reason about then using guard(...). That said,
if others as well prefer using guard() them I'm open to switch to it.
Thanks,
--Nilay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 3:28 [PATCH 00/23] nvmet: add context annotation for params in struct nvmet_ns Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 01/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::bdev Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 20:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 21:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-10 6:38 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-10 17:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-11 7:25 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-11 18:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-12 9:04 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-12 17:35 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 02/23] nvmet: fix nvmet_ns::bdev access using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 20:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 21:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-10 6:49 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 03/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::file Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 20:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 21:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-10 7:12 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 04/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::bdev_file Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 05/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::readonly Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 06/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::nsid Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 21:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-10 8:50 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 07/23] nvmet: fix nvmet_ns::nsid access using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 08/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::blksize_shift Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 09/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::size Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 10/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::nguid Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 11/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::uuid Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 21:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-11-10 9:01 ` Nilay Shroff [this message]
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 12/23] nvmet: fix nvmet_ns::uuid access using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 13/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::buffered_io Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 14/23] nvmet: fix nvmet_ns::buffered_io access using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 15/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::enabled Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 16/23] nvmet: fix access to nvmet_ns::enable using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 17/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::device_path Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 18/23] nvmet: fix nvmet_ns::device_path access using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 21:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 19/23] nvmet: add context annotation for PCI P2P parameters in struct nvmet_ns Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 20/23] nvmet: fix PCI P2P parameters access using nvmet_subsys::lock Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 22:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 21/23] nvmet: add context annotation for integrity params in struct nvmet_ns Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 22/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::csi Nilay Shroff
2026-11-09 3:28 ` [PATCH 23/23] nvmet: add context annotation for nvmet_ns::debugfs_dir Nilay Shroff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f3ab5d9d-cdf9-4e9c-b0ad-167cc88fdfef@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=gjoyce@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.