From: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
"David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
npiggin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mmu_gather: define RCU version tlb_remove_table_one() in CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 10:09:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f44fac08-771f-4619-b8a4-6ea740df424f@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260222004512.839-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Hi Wei,
On 2/22/26 8:45 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
> Before commit 718b13861d22 ("x86: mm: free page table pages by RCU
> instead of semi RCU"), the page table pages will be freed by semi RCU,
> that is:
>
> - batch table freeing: asynchronous free by RCU
> - single table freeing: IPI + synchronous free
>
> This commit introduce a RCU version for single table freeing to support
> PT_RECLAIM. While it is not necessary to limit the RCU version only in
> CONFIG_PT_RECLAIM. It is reasonable to asynchronous free single table by
> RCU if CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE.
>
> This patch moves the definition of single table freeing in
> CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE, so we have both RCU version
> batch/single table freeing if CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE.
Thank you for doing this, but we can't do it right now.
See the latest version:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/9c8c02df3f8742f6db927e787ab971fd0b5ac08a,
when the
HAVE_ARCH_TLB_REMOVE_TABLE is selected, the pt_rcu_head member
cannot be used.
Thanks,
Qi
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> Cc: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
> Cc: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
> ---
> mm/mmu_gather.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mmu_gather.c b/mm/mmu_gather.c
> index fe5b6a031717..6c1cbd9c717b 100644
> --- a/mm/mmu_gather.c
> +++ b/mm/mmu_gather.c
> @@ -296,6 +296,22 @@ static void tlb_remove_table_free(struct mmu_table_batch *batch)
> call_rcu(&batch->rcu, tlb_remove_table_rcu);
> }
>
> +static inline void __tlb_remove_table_one_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> +{
> + struct ptdesc *ptdesc;
> +
> + ptdesc = container_of(head, struct ptdesc, pt_rcu_head);
> + __tlb_remove_table(ptdesc);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void tlb_remove_table_one(void *table)
> +{
> + struct ptdesc *ptdesc;
> +
> + ptdesc = table;
> + call_rcu(&ptdesc->pt_rcu_head, __tlb_remove_table_one_rcu);
> +}
> +
> #else /* !CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE */
>
> static void tlb_remove_table_free(struct mmu_table_batch *batch)
> @@ -303,6 +319,12 @@ static void tlb_remove_table_free(struct mmu_table_batch *batch)
> __tlb_remove_table_free(batch);
> }
>
> +static inline void tlb_remove_table_one(void *table)
> +{
> + tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
> + __tlb_remove_table(table);
> +}
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE */
>
> /*
> @@ -320,35 +342,6 @@ static inline void tlb_table_invalidate(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
> }
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PT_RECLAIM
> -static inline void __tlb_remove_table_one_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> -{
> - struct ptdesc *ptdesc;
> -
> - ptdesc = container_of(head, struct ptdesc, pt_rcu_head);
> - __tlb_remove_table(ptdesc);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void __tlb_remove_table_one(void *table)
> -{
> - struct ptdesc *ptdesc;
> -
> - ptdesc = table;
> - call_rcu(&ptdesc->pt_rcu_head, __tlb_remove_table_one_rcu);
> -}
> -#else
> -static inline void __tlb_remove_table_one(void *table)
> -{
> - tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
> - __tlb_remove_table(table);
> -}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_PT_RECLAIM */
> -
> -static void tlb_remove_table_one(void *table)
> -{
> - __tlb_remove_table_one(table);
> -}
> -
> static void tlb_table_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
> {
> struct mmu_table_batch **batch = &tlb->batch;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-24 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-22 0:45 [PATCH] mm/mmu_gather: define RCU version tlb_remove_table_one() in CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE Wei Yang
2026-02-22 19:42 ` Andrew Morton
2026-02-22 23:51 ` Wei Yang
2026-02-24 2:09 ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2026-02-24 2:57 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f44fac08-771f-4619-b8a4-6ea740df424f@linux.dev \
--to=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.