From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org From: "Joshua Watt" Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] SPDX: Add annotations to relationship References: <20211027013050.137364-1-saul.wold@windriver.com> <5a8c05846279f160ee2d5fe7ef7502c29e1bfee1.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <2035d95566fd1cb0453186cc8034f234b9e9fc98.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Message-ID: Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 15:45:26 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2035d95566fd1cb0453186cc8034f234b9e9fc98.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US List-id: To: Richard Purdie , Jose Quaresma Cc: Steve Sakoman , Saul Wold , OE-core On 11/4/21 3:43 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 20:00 +0000, Jose Quaresma wrote: >> >> Richard Purdie escreveu no dia quinta, >> 28/10/2021 à(s) 21:58: >>> On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 08:47 -1000, Steve Sakoman wrote: >>>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 10:41 PM Jose Quaresma >>> wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> There are any plans or is it possible to backport the SBOM/SPDX to the >>> dunfell branch? >>>> I'm going to yield to Saul as to whether he thinks this is >>>> desirable/possible or not. >>> The packagedata changes are pretty invasive unfortunately and likely not >>> something you're going to want in dunfell sadly. >>> >> >> Thanks for the clarification. >> > I have been thinking a bit more about this. I did wonder if we should consider a > mixin layer of some kind for it that could work with dunfell? > > We could host it, it is just a question of writing the mixin layer and > maintaining it. I don't think it's going to be possible with a pure mixin layer, since it relies on the extended package data? > > Cheers, > > Richard >