From: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
Cc: "Smith, Craig" <craig.d.smith@siemens.com>,
paulus@samba.org,
linux-ppc-embedded <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.x on 8xx status
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:57:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f4f476b5e54e9f005dd28082bd5f16fe@embeddededge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050322130426.GE2498@logos.cnet>
On Mar 22, 2005, at 8:04 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> I'm quite puzzled. Why v2.6 calls the "tlbie" instruction 100-or-so
> less times than v2.4 ?
Oh my ... I'm more worried about the high number of TLB misses
in 2.6 compared to 2.4. That's really bad. How did you instrument
the tlbie measurement? It could be that 2.4 used lots more 'tlbia'
which were replaced by tlbie in 2.6.
Thanks.
-- Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-22 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-21 11:59 Linux 2.6.x on 8xx status Smith, Craig
2004-09-21 11:53 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-09-21 16:54 ` Dan Malek
2004-09-21 17:03 ` Dan Malek
2004-09-22 11:09 ` Sam Song
2004-10-15 15:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-16 2:13 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-16 9:08 ` Sam Song
2004-10-18 5:59 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-10-18 6:22 ` Sam Song
2004-10-18 3:10 ` Dan Malek
2005-02-10 15:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-10 19:26 ` Dan Malek
2005-02-10 17:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-02-10 17:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-21 21:45 ` Guillaume Autran
2005-03-21 21:53 ` Robert P. J. Day
2005-03-22 13:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-22 20:57 ` Dan Malek [this message]
2005-03-22 17:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-22 22:53 ` Dan Malek
2005-03-23 10:25 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-23 16:12 ` Dan Malek
2005-03-23 16:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-24 14:05 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2005-03-23 14:06 ` Guillaume Autran
2005-02-11 3:42 ` Dan Malek
2005-02-21 21:12 ` Armin Schindler
2005-02-21 23:45 ` Guillaume Autran
2005-02-15 9:39 ` Reading of RTC robin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-22 11:20 Linux 2.6.x on 8xx status Joakim Tjernlund
2004-10-25 15:00 Sam Song
2004-09-17 13:57 Smith, Craig
2004-09-17 13:50 ` Pantelis Antoniou
[not found] <20040916201505.E723B2BDB2@ozlabs.org>
2004-09-17 10:06 ` Song Sam
2004-09-17 9:55 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-09-18 20:11 ` Song Sam
2004-09-20 6:02 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-09-20 11:47 ` Song Sam
2004-09-20 17:49 ` Tom Rini
2004-09-20 18:02 ` Robert P. J. Day
2004-09-20 18:17 ` Tom Rini
2004-09-21 1:38 ` Song Sam
2004-09-21 6:12 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-09-21 10:35 ` Song Sam
2004-09-21 10:41 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-10-15 15:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-16 18:56 Smith, Craig
2004-09-16 20:07 ` Dan Malek
2004-09-17 5:43 ` Pantelis Antoniou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f4f476b5e54e9f005dd28082bd5f16fe@embeddededge.com \
--to=dan@embeddededge.com \
--cc=craig.d.smith@siemens.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
--cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.