From: Peter Daum <gator_ml@yahoo.de>
To: linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: [linux-lvm] pvresize after extending RAID array
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:16:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f56smj$275$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
I have a physical volume consisting of 1 hardware raid array (/dev/sdb).
Now I added some disks to the raid array, extending its size from 4.5
to ~6 TB. The kernel (Linux 2.6.16.51) now correctly reports the new
device size:
# cat /sys/block/sdb/size
12695042048
From reading the manuals I got the impression, that all that is needed
to be able to use the additional space is "pvresize /dev/sdb".
Unfortunately, it looks like pvresize insists on the old device size:
# pvresize -v -d /dev/sdb
File descriptor 3 left open
Using physical volume(s) on command line
Archiving volume group "raid6_12" metadata (seqno 19).
No change to size of physical volume /dev/sdb.
Resizing volume "/dev/sdb" to 9765416576 sectors.
Updating physical volume "/dev/sdb"
Creating volume group backup "/etc/lvm/backup/raid6_12" (seqno 20).
Physical volume "/dev/sdb" changed
1 physical volume(s) resized / 0 physical volume(s) not resized
Did I miss something? Is there anything to worry about or should I just
go ahead and set the new device size manually:
# pvresize -v -d --setphysicalvolumesize 6347521024k /dev/sdb
File descriptor 3 left open
Using physical volume(s) on command line
Archiving volume group "raid6_12" metadata (seqno 22).
WARNING: /dev/sdb: Overriding real size. You could lose data.
/dev/sdb: Pretending size is 12695042048 not 12695035904 sectors.
No change to size of physical volume /dev/sdb.
Resizing volume "/dev/sdb" to 12695041664 sectors.
Updating physical volume "/dev/sdb"
Creating volume group backup "/etc/lvm/backup/raid6_12" (seqno 23).
Physical volume "/dev/sdb" changed
1 physical volume(s) resized / 0 physical volume(s) not resized
In this case, pvresize comes up with yet another size for the device
(12695035904 sectors) - is this the actual size of the device minus
the space needed for lvm's metadata? Should I manually set to this?
Any comments?
Regards,
Peter Daum
next reply other threads:[~2007-06-18 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-18 21:16 Peter Daum [this message]
2007-06-19 9:49 ` [linux-lvm] Re: pvresize after extending RAID array Peter Daum
2007-06-19 13:16 ` [linux-lvm] " Alasdair G Kergon
2007-06-19 17:46 ` [linux-lvm] " Peter Daum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='f56smj$275$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=gator_ml@yahoo.de \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.