Re: [PATCH v2] um: Avoid longjmp/setjmp symbol clashes with libpthread.a

[Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>]

On 06/01/2017 01:17 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 01.06.2017 um 22:15 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
>> On 06/01/2017 01:11 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Florian,
>>>
>>> Am 01.06.2017 um 21:38 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
>>>>> Presumably because we are not using the same glibc version? The one I
>>>>> have installed on this machine is glibc-2.12, do you want me to attach a
>>>>> copy of it?
>>>>
>>>> Richard, what do we do with this?
>>>
>>> I'd like to see the issues that Thomas sees also get addressed.
>>
>> Sure, but that seems orthogonal? In the absence of an answer from Eli,
>> either you could take my patch or just send reverts of Eli's two
>> commits, whichever you prefer.
> 
> Or you and Thomas could investigate. :-)

Honestly, I don't know what do you want me to investigate, my host
machine is old (2.6.32) and does not support PTRACE_GETREGSET or
friends, nor does it have _xstate, so with that, we either don't use
those period, which would be a revert, or we just conditionally build
support for that (my patch) and everyone is happy.

I don't know what the issue Thomas is having (he is now CC'd) and I
still don't understand why you insist on conflating the symbol clash
while statically linking with support for newer x86 FPU stuff...
-- 
Florian