From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev>
To: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>, broonie@kernel.org
Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: cs35l56/57/62/63: Use the correct SoundWire DP for feedback
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2026 17:57:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f58d1a49-0cf5-4885-8011-433d7ccc4be1@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d510a866-86c8-467a-8831-b373636874bf@opensource.cirrus.com>
On 10/6/26 11:53, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> On 05/10/2026 7:33 pm, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> On 10/5/26 17:52, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
>>> The amp feedback path (AEC) was incorrectly using SoundWire DP3.
>>> The firmware outputs SDCA OT25 feedback on DP4. DP3 is reserved for
>>> SDCA companion amp.
>>>
>>> This series adds a DAI for OT25 and switches the sdw machine driver
>>> to use the new DAI for the feedback path.
>>
>> Is there any merit in keeping this DP3 exposed as a capture DAI, if
>> indeed it's intended to be a side connection for a companion chip?
>
> I kept this patch to a minimum because it is a Fixes: so it must apply
> to older kernels.
>
> However, you are correct. DP3 isn't used now. Not even on companion amp.
> DP3 is a companion output from the amp (SDCA OT127), but Cirrus
> companion amp goes codec->amp so uses DP1 on the amp.
>
> When the driver was being written the SDCA spec and firmware behavior
> were not fully defined so pairing of the symmetrical DP1+DP3
> (for play+capture) was carried forward from previous amps. But SDCA
> doesn't provide any sort of UCM capability - widgets on the device have
> defined, fixed functionality that has to be preconfigured by the
> firmware to match what SDCA needs. Ultimately DP4 was more suitable for
> OT25. DP4 also works for loopback testing.
>
> Removing DP3 would also solve some other problems that the driver and
> firmware are both "owning" the registers. We originally attempted to
> sync this up, then gave up on that complexity and overwrite the register
> settings the firmware made.
thanks for the explanations, I guess we'll see a follow-up patch to
remove DP3 altogether at some point.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-05 15:52 [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: cs35l56/57/62/63: Use the correct SoundWire DP for feedback Richard Fitzgerald
2026-10-05 15:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: cs35l56: Add DAI for SDCA OT25 stream Richard Fitzgerald
2026-10-05 15:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: sdw_utils: Switch CS35L56/57/62/63 to use OT25 DAI Richard Fitzgerald
2026-10-05 18:33 ` [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: cs35l56/57/62/63: Use the correct SoundWire DP for feedback Pierre-Louis Bossart
2026-10-06 9:53 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2026-10-07 15:57 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2026-10-07 11:21 ` Mark Brown
2026-10-07 15:57 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f58d1a49-0cf5-4885-8011-433d7ccc4be1@linux.dev \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.