All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Jiawei Zhao <phoenix500526@163.com>, ast@kernel.org
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] selftests/bpf: Force -O2 for USDT selftests to cover SIB handling logic
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 11:17:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5d8d886-1de3-4521-917a-e98b645b987e@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250806092458.111972-3-phoenix500526@163.com>



On 8/6/25 2:24 AM, Jiawei Zhao wrote:
> When using GCC on x86-64 to compile an usdt prog with -O1 or higher
> optimization, the compiler will generate SIB addressing mode for global
> array and PC-relative addressing mode for global variable,
> e.g. "1@-96(%rbp,%rax,8)" and "-1@4+t1(%rip)".
>
> In this patch:
> - add usdt_o2 test case to cover SIB addressing usdt argument spec
>    handling logic
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiawei Zhao <phoenix500526@163.com>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile          |  8 +++
>   .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/usdt_o2.c        | 71 +++++++++++++++++++
>   .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_usdt_o2.c        | 37 ++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 116 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/usdt_o2.c
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_usdt_o2.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> index 910d8d6402ef..68cf6a9cf05f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -759,6 +759,14 @@ TRUNNER_BPF_BUILD_RULE := $$(error no BPF objects should be built)
>   TRUNNER_BPF_CFLAGS :=
>   $(eval $(call DEFINE_TEST_RUNNER,test_maps))
>   
> +# Use -O2 optimization to generate SIB addressing usdt argument spec
> +# Only apply on x86 architecture where SIB addressing is relevant
> +ifeq ($(ARCH), x86)
> +$(OUTPUT)/usdt_o2.test.o: CFLAGS:=$(subst O0,O2,$(CFLAGS))
> +$(OUTPUT)/cpuv4/usdt_o2.test.o: CFLAGS:=$(subst O0,O2,$(CFLAGS))
> +$(OUTPUT)/no_alu32/usdt_o2.test.o: CFLAGS:=$(subst O0,O2,$(CFLAGS))
> +endif

I tried your selftest with gcc14 and llvm20 in my environment. See below:

llvm20:
Displaying notes found in: .note.stapsdt
   Owner                Data size        Description
   stapsdt              0x0000002f       NT_STAPSDT (SystemTap probe descriptors)
     Provider: test
     Name: usdt1
     Location: 0x00000000000003ac, Base: 0x0000000000000000, Semaphore: 0x0000000000000000
     Arguments: 8@-64(%rbp)

gcc14:
Displaying notes found in: .note.stapsdt
   Owner                Data size        Description
   stapsdt              0x00000034       NT_STAPSDT (SystemTap probe descriptors)
     Provider: test
     Name: usdt1
     Location: 0x0000000000000334, Base: 0x0000000000000000, Semaphore: 0x0000000000000000
     Arguments: 8@array(,%rax,8)

llvm20 and gcc14 generate different usdt patterns. '8@-64(%rbp)' already supports so
with SIB support, the test should pass CI, I think.

> +
>   # Define test_verifier test runner.
>   # It is much simpler than test_maps/test_progs and sufficiently different from
>   # them (e.g., test.h is using completely pattern), that it's worth just
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/usdt_o2.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/usdt_o2.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f04b756b3640
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/usdt_o2.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2025 Jiawei Zhao <phoenix500526@163.com>. */
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +
> +#define _SDT_HAS_SEMAPHORES 1
> +#include "../sdt.h"
> +#include "test_usdt_o2.skel.h"
> +
> +int lets_test_this(int);
> +
> +#define test_value 0xFEDCBA9876543210ULL
> +#define SEC(name) __attribute__((section(name), used))
> +
> +
> +static volatile __u64 array[1] = {test_value};
> +unsigned short test_usdt1_semaphore SEC(".probes");
> +
> +static __always_inline void trigger_func(void)
> +{
> +	/* Base address + offset + (index * scale) */
> +	if (test_usdt1_semaphore) {
> +		for (volatile int i = 0; i <= 0; i++)
> +			STAP_PROBE1(test, usdt1, array[i]);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void basic_sib_usdt(void)
> +{
> +	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_usdt_opts, opts);
> +	struct test_usdt_o2 *skel;
> +	struct test_usdt_o2__bss *bss;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	skel = test_usdt_o2__open_and_load();
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	bss = skel->bss;
> +	bss->my_pid = getpid();
> +
> +	err = test_usdt_o2__attach(skel);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_attach"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	/* usdt1 won't be auto-attached */
> +	opts.usdt_cookie = 0xcafedeadbeeffeed;
> +	skel->links.usdt1 = bpf_program__attach_usdt(skel->progs.usdt1,
> +						     0 /*self*/, "/proc/self/exe",
> +						     "test", "usdt1", &opts);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.usdt1, "usdt1_link"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	trigger_func();
> +
> +	ASSERT_EQ(bss->usdt1_called, 1, "usdt1_called");
> +	ASSERT_EQ(bss->usdt1_cookie, 0xcafedeadbeeffeed, "usdt1_cookie");
> +	ASSERT_EQ(bss->usdt1_arg_cnt, 1, "usdt1_arg_cnt");
> +	ASSERT_EQ(bss->usdt1_arg, test_value, "usdt1_arg");
> +	ASSERT_EQ(bss->usdt1_arg_ret, 0, "usdt1_arg_ret");
> +	ASSERT_EQ(bss->usdt1_arg_size, sizeof(array[0]), "usdt1_arg_size");
> +
> +cleanup:
> +	test_usdt_o2__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
> +
> +
> +void test_usdt_o2(void)
> +{
> +	basic_sib_usdt();
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_usdt_o2.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_usdt_o2.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..14602aa54578
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_usdt_o2.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
> +
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include <bpf/usdt.bpf.h>
> +
> +int my_pid;
> +
> +int usdt1_called;
> +u64 usdt1_cookie;
> +int usdt1_arg_cnt;
> +int usdt1_arg_ret;
> +u64 usdt1_arg;
> +int usdt1_arg_size;
> +
> +SEC("usdt")
> +int usdt1(struct pt_regs *ctx)
> +{
> +	long tmp;
> +
> +	if (my_pid != (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	__sync_fetch_and_add(&usdt1_called, 1);
> +
> +	usdt1_cookie = bpf_usdt_cookie(ctx);
> +	usdt1_arg_cnt = bpf_usdt_arg_cnt(ctx);
> +
> +	usdt1_arg_ret = bpf_usdt_arg(ctx, 0, &tmp);
> +	usdt1_arg = (u64)tmp;
> +	usdt1_arg_size = bpf_usdt_arg_size(ctx, 0);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-06 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-06  9:24 [PATCH v7 0/2] libbpf: fix USDT SIB argument handling causing unrecognized register error Jiawei Zhao
2025-08-06  9:24 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] " Jiawei Zhao
2025-08-06  9:24 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] selftests/bpf: Force -O2 for USDT selftests to cover SIB handling logic Jiawei Zhao
2025-08-06 18:17   ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2025-08-07  2:57     ` 赵佳炜
2025-08-07 18:01       ` Yonghong Song
2025-08-10  8:55         ` 赵佳炜
2025-08-10  9:39           ` 赵佳炜
2025-08-12  5:06           ` Yonghong Song
2025-08-12  7:02             ` 赵佳炜
2025-08-12 16:11               ` Yonghong Song
2025-08-13  2:27                 ` 赵佳炜
2025-08-13  5:24                   ` Yonghong Song
2025-08-13  6:23                     ` 赵佳炜
2025-08-17 13:43                     ` 赵佳炜
2025-08-18 17:35                       ` Yonghong Song
2025-08-19  9:50                         ` 赵佳炜
2025-08-20 20:57                           ` Yonghong Song
2025-08-20 23:00                         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-08-21 15:38                           ` 赵佳炜
2025-08-21 18:28                             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-08-22 15:39                               ` 赵佳炜
2025-08-07  9:28     ` Jiri Olsa
2025-08-06 18:07 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] libbpf: fix USDT SIB argument handling causing unrecognized register error Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f5d8d886-1de3-4521-917a-e98b645b987e@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phoenix500526@163.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.