All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qinyun Tan <qinyuntan@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	"Roman Gushchin" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	"Shakeel Butt" <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	"Muchun Song" <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>, "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	"Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Usama Arif" <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
	"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"Qi Zheng" <qi.zheng@linux.dev>, "Yosry Ahmed" <yosry@kernel.org>,
	"Nhat Pham" <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
	"Chengming Zhou" <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
	"Xunlei Pang" <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] mm: thp: restore SHRINKER_NONSLAB on the deferred split shrinker
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 15:46:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5f6327a-bc9e-415c-a8b2-b498883b9746@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aqGlV7NjxrFPYtRH@cmpxchg.org>

Hi Johannes,

On 9/10/26 2:28 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2026 at 07:01:10PM +0800, Qinyun Tan wrote:
>> On a system booted with cgroup.memory=nokmem, the deferred split
>> shrinker is quietly demoted to a non-memcg-aware one.  As a result,
>> partially unmapped THPs are only split under global reclaim; memcg
>> (limit-induced) reclaim never splits them, so a cgroup under memory
>> pressure keeps its underused THPs intact.
>>
>> This is a regression from commit fafaeceb89a5 ("mm: switch deferred
>> split shrinker to list_lru"), which re-registered the shrinker without
>> SHRINKER_NONSLAB.  The shrinker had carried this flag since commit
>> 0a432dcbeb32 ("mm: shrinker: make shrinker not depend on memcg kmem")
>> precisely so it would keep working with kmem accounting disabled.
>> Without the flag, shrinker_memcg_alloc() fails with -ENOSYS under
>> nokmem and the shrinker loses its memcg awareness.
> 
> Here is the reason why it was dropped:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ah9PGv12mqai84ES@cmpxchg.org/
> 
> After your patch to make list_lru expand for NONSLAB shrinkers, it can
> be restored.
> 

Thanks for the pointer. I'll update the commit message in v3 and
reference that thread.

>> This was noticed by Michal during review of the patch "mm/list_lru:
>> don't copy stale shrinker id from non-memcg-aware shrinkers" [1].
>>
>> Restore the flag.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/697713c4-0857-485b-aba7-c74f37a3c8b4@linux.alibaba.com/
>>
>> Fixes: fafaeceb89a5 ("mm: switch deferred split shrinker to list_lru")
>> Suggested-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Qinyun Tan <qinyuntan@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
>> Acked-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
>> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>


Thanks again,
Qinyun Tan

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-10  7:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-07 11:01 [PATCH v2 0/4] mm: restore per-memcg reclaim for NONSLAB shrinkers under nokmem Qinyun Tan
2026-09-07 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: memcontrol: drop kmemcg_id and use the memcg ID for list_lru indexing Qinyun Tan
2026-09-09 18:21   ` Johannes Weiner
2026-09-10  7:40     ` Qinyun Tan
2026-09-07 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: list_lru: keep per-memcg lists with nokmem for NONSLAB-backed lrus Qinyun Tan
2026-09-09 18:22   ` Johannes Weiner
2026-09-07 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm: thp: restore SHRINKER_NONSLAB on the deferred split shrinker Qinyun Tan
2026-09-09 18:28   ` Johannes Weiner
2026-09-10  7:46     ` Qinyun Tan [this message]
2026-09-07 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: zswap: mark the zswap shrinker SHRINKER_NONSLAB Qinyun Tan
2026-09-07 11:33   ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-09-09 18:29   ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f5f6327a-bc9e-415c-a8b2-b498883b9746@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=qinyuntan@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=xlpang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=yosry@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.