From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
To: Denis OSTERLAND-HEIM <denis.osterland@diehl.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pps: add epoll support
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:36:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6bed779-6d59-4f0f-8a59-b6312bd83b4e@enneenne.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11965b8b6101487996df902d35ba2ea3@diehl.com>
On 25/02/25 17:34, Denis OSTERLAND-HEIM wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2025 3:24 PM
>> To: Denis OSTERLAND-HEIM <denis.osterland@diehl.com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pps: add epoll support
>>
> [snip]
>>
>>> If I start multiple user space programs data races are visible.
>>>
>>> ```
>>> # for i in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6; do PpsPollTest /dev/pps1 > log$i & done
>>> # sleep 6
>>> # tail log*
>>> ==> log0 <==
>>> timeout
>>> assert: 196
>>> time: 1520599554.276752928
>>> assert: 197
>>> time: 1520599555.300692704
>>
>> This is the same behavior we have when working with a serial port: if more than
>> one process gets access to it, data is stolen.
> Okay, then lets choose your suggestion.
>
>>
>>> >From my point of view it would be great to fix this bug without such an limitation.
>>
>> I disagree, it is not a limitation! It is like a normal char device work.
>>
>> What we have to test now is if your initial goal has been addressed! That is, in
>> an application that has more to do than just dealing with one PPS device, we can
>> use poll()/select() in order to avoid using threads.
> I will do the final test.
Try poll() by using a process workin on multiple pps sources.
> I expect that it works with your patch.
:)
> Shall I prepare the patch?
Yes.
> Shall I add you as Co-author?
Yes. Add my name in the Signed-off-by: line and, please, send to me a preview.
> Or do you want to send your patch with me in reported-by and tested-by?
>
> Fixes: eae9d2ba0cfc ("LinuxPPS: core support")?
OK.
> CC stable?
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
And explain the goal of the patch within the description.
Thanks a lot!
Ciao,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver giometti@linux.it
Embedded Systems phone: +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-25 16:34 Re: [PATCH] pps: add epoll support Denis OSTERLAND-HEIM
2025-02-26 7:36 ` Rodolfo Giometti [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-25 13:39 Denis OSTERLAND-HEIM
2025-02-25 14:24 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2025-02-24 11:38 Denis OSTERLAND-HEIM
2025-02-24 17:38 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2025-02-19 12:21 Denis OSTERLAND-HEIM
2025-02-20 8:50 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2025-02-20 16:45 ` Denis OSTERLAND-HEIM
2025-02-21 9:17 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2025-01-20 13:10 Denis OSTERLAND-HEIM
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f6bed779-6d59-4f0f-8a59-b6312bd83b4e@enneenne.com \
--to=giometti@enneenne.com \
--cc=denis.osterland@diehl.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.