From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git-rm isn't the inverse action of git-add
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:20:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f72hu8$65g$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 46895EA4.5040803@jaeger.mine.nu
Christian Jaeger wrote:
> I don't per se require undo actions. I just don't understand why git-rm
> refuses to remove the file from the index, even if I didn't commit it.
> The index is just an intermediate record of the changes in my
> understandings, and the rm action would also be intermediate until it's
> being committed. And a non-committed action being deleted shouldn't need
> a special confirmation from me, especially not one which is consisting
> of a combination of two flags (of which one is a destructive one).
Should git-rm refuse to remove index entry if it is different from working
directory version or not?
--
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-11 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-02 18:09 git-rm isn't the inverse action of git-add Christian Jaeger
2007-07-02 19:42 ` Yann Dirson
2007-07-02 20:23 ` Christian Jaeger
2007-07-02 20:40 ` Yann Dirson
2007-07-02 20:54 ` Matthieu Moy
2007-07-02 21:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-03 10:37 ` Matthieu Moy
2007-07-03 12:09 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-03 13:40 ` Matthieu Moy
2007-07-03 14:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-04 20:08 ` Jan Hudec
2007-07-05 13:44 ` Matthieu Moy
2007-07-05 14:00 ` David Kastrup
2007-07-08 17:36 ` [RFC][PATCH] " Matthieu Moy
2007-07-08 18:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-08 20:34 ` Matthieu Moy
2007-07-08 21:49 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-09 9:45 ` Matthieu Moy
2007-07-13 17:36 ` Matthieu Moy
2007-07-13 17:41 ` [PATCH] More permissive "git-rm --cached" behavior without -f Matthieu Moy
2007-07-13 17:57 ` Jeff King
2007-07-13 18:53 ` Matthieu Moy
2007-07-14 3:42 ` Jeff King
2007-07-14 0:44 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-07-14 6:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-07-14 7:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-07-14 10:14 ` Matthieu Moy
2007-07-02 21:20 ` git-rm isn't the inverse action of git-add Christian Jaeger
2007-07-03 4:12 ` Jeff King
2007-07-03 4:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-07-03 4:59 ` Jeff King
2007-07-03 5:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-07-03 5:12 ` Jeff King
2007-07-03 6:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-07-11 12:20 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2007-07-11 18:56 ` Jan Hudec
2007-07-11 21:26 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='f72hu8$65g$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.