From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Parag Warudkar" Subject: Re: [Bug #11342] Linux 2.6.27-rc3: kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c - bisected Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:54:28 -0400 Message-ID: References: <48B313E0.1000501@hp.com> <200808261111.19205.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20080826183051.GB10925@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <20080826205916.GB11734@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=sGJGDZToS2pnWBy1ncM2b9ZVRuB1R8bypAZqLCi+K3w=; b=H9qoRo2VgjQQW1gIHNbare0famuA+VNbVppB+VTXQO1IA75GB7T6t7q9/RGA1JwI2e ZHsqXiTiWy4fv7Jy4LJPpzUYbfuEblNSjFwMs7yj6sjaTjzy2dVriYcfdeJRudNMRgMy xUjKHBtEy67v55TrM5GDZ1aBqWtR7eQA8IhfY= In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Adrian Bunk , Rusty Russell , "Alan D. Brunelle" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven , Ingo Molnar , linux-embedded-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > And embedded people (the ones that might care about 1% code size) are the > ones that would also want smaller stacks even more! This is something I never understood - embedded devices are not going to run more than a few processes and 4K*(Few Processes) IMHO is not worth a saving now a days even in embedded world given falling memory prices. Or do I misunderstand? Parag From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753486AbYHZWyl (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:54:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751839AbYHZWyb (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:54:31 -0400 Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.204.228]:45979 "EHLO qb-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751476AbYHZWya (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:54:30 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=ol1LrEorzD52g/OG6zsbkWvi02niBCiBRLiq30LKCcxY3PcYLM+pcik0TsIvqf+YGe C68Gxz/lPo8eeyU6cJrw1IxvLTatR3p0ECgsOlRVu+vjwgEeB6MZGD3mjTlmiNM9xrOp cKLKSmpbNGUmHxpBcn+OqY7OZmOtyErVtwNJ4= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:54:28 -0400 From: "Parag Warudkar" To: "Linus Torvalds" Subject: Re: [Bug #11342] Linux 2.6.27-rc3: kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c - bisected Cc: "Adrian Bunk" , "Rusty Russell" , "Alan D. Brunelle" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Kernel Testers List" , "Andrew Morton" , "Arjan van de Ven" , "Ingo Molnar" , linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48B313E0.1000501@hp.com> <200808261111.19205.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20080826183051.GB10925@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> <20080826205916.GB11734@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > And embedded people (the ones that might care about 1% code size) are the > ones that would also want smaller stacks even more! This is something I never understood - embedded devices are not going to run more than a few processes and 4K*(Few Processes) IMHO is not worth a saving now a days even in embedded world given falling memory prices. Or do I misunderstand? Parag