From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-devsrc: restructure for out of tree (and on target) module builds
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 14:53:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7a60084dfdcbe937ad60021adb1fa6bec88eeff.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dee40069-d36a-2b70-56f6-5b52f3c1e7c4@windriver.com>
On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 09:49 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 2018-07-10 5:41 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-07-10 at 12:38 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > > On 07/10/2018 06:21 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2018-07-09 at 11:53 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll try the other configs, but clearly I have something
> > > different in
> > > my x86-64 build.
> > >
> > > I can't run the self tests directly, but am copying the files
> > > onto my
> > > qemu session and running things myself:
> > >
> > > root@qemux86-64:/lib/modules/4.14.48-yocto-standard/build# make
> > > ARCH=x86
> > > scripts prepare
> > > Makefile:950: "Cannot use CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION=y, please
> > > install
> > > libelf-dev, libelf-devel or elfutils-libelf-devel"
> > > CHK scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.h
> > > SYSTBL arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_32.h
> > > SYSHDR arch/x86/include/generated/asm/unistd_32_ia32.h
> > > SYSHDR arch/x86/include/generated/asm/unistd_64_x32.h
> > > SYSTBL arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h
> > > SYSHDR arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_32.h
> > > SYSHDR arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h
> > > SYSHDR arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_x32.h
> > > HOSTCC arch/x86/tools/relocs_32.o
> > > HOSTCC arch/x86/tools/relocs_64.o
> > > HOSTCC arch/x86/tools/relocs_common.o
> > > HOSTLD arch/x86/tools/relocs
> > > CHK include/config/kernel.release
> > > CHK include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h
> > > CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
> > > Makefile:950: "Cannot use CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION=y, please
> > > install
> > > libelf-dev, libelf-devel or elfutils-libelf-devel"
> > >
> > > root@qemux86-64:/tmp# make
> > > make -C /usr/src/kernel M=/tmp modules
> > > make[1]: Entering directory '/lib/modules/4.14.48-yocto-
> > > standard/build'
> > > Makefile:950: "Cannot use CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION=y, please
> > > install
> > > libelf-dev, libelf-devel or elfutils-libelf-devel"
> > > Building modules, stage 2.
> > > MODPOST 1 modules
> > > make[1]: Leaving directory '/lib/modules/4.14.48-yocto-
> > > standard/build'
> > > root@qemux86-64:/tmp# insmod hellomod.ko
> > > [ 419.211616] hellomod: loading out-of-tree module taints
> > > kernel.
> > > [ 419.212586] Hello world!
> > >
> > > This is on the core-image-kernel-dev image, which is the one that
> > > I created to test all this.
> > >
> > > What image is that using ? some sato sdk one ?
> >
> > We really need to find you a way to run these. The problem is the
> > qemu
> > graphics piece? You can't have a dummy vncserver or something to
> > direct
> > them at?
> >
> > The image is a core-image-sato-sdk...
>
> I was able to trigger the objtool issue with this image, looking at
> fixing it and the other arches now.
Since its image related, is it a missing package dependency? Just
curious why its happening with some images but not your test ones...
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-12 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-09 15:53 [PATCH v2] kernel-devsrc: restructure for out of tree (and on target) module builds Bruce Ashfield
2018-07-10 10:21 ` Richard Purdie
2018-07-10 13:09 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-07-10 16:38 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-07-10 21:41 ` Richard Purdie
2018-07-11 2:34 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-07-12 13:49 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-07-12 13:53 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2018-07-12 13:55 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-07-12 17:02 ` Khem Raj
2018-07-12 17:07 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-07-12 17:22 ` Khem Raj
2018-07-12 17:26 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-07-26 14:04 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-07-26 14:17 ` richard.purdie
2018-07-26 17:01 ` Richard Purdie
2018-07-30 22:26 ` richard.purdie
2018-07-31 1:07 ` Bruce Ashfield
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-02-28 19:20 Bruce Ashfield
2018-02-28 21:10 ` Mark Hatle
2018-02-28 21:12 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-03-01 8:28 ` Maxin B. John
2018-03-01 9:37 ` Burton, Ross
2018-03-01 10:58 ` Maxin B. John
2018-03-01 12:58 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-03-01 13:59 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-03-01 14:22 ` Burton, Ross
2018-03-01 14:45 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-03-01 14:57 ` Burton, Ross
2018-03-02 14:23 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-03-02 14:26 ` Burton, Ross
2018-03-02 15:20 ` Khem Raj
2018-03-02 18:16 ` Khem Raj
2018-03-02 19:29 ` Bruce Ashfield
2018-03-02 23:14 ` Burton, Ross
2018-03-01 12:57 ` Bruce Ashfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7a60084dfdcbe937ad60021adb1fa6bec88eeff.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.