From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
dev@openvswitch.org, Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next v4 07/15] openvswitch: Merge three per-CPU structures into one
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 10:13:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7ta57fe0uz.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250512092736.229935-8-bigeasy@linutronix.de> (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior's message of "Mon, 12 May 2025 11:27:28 +0200")
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> writes:
> exec_actions_level is a per-CPU integer allocated at compile time.
> action_fifos and flow_keys are per-CPU pointer and have their data
> allocated at module init time.
> There is no gain in splitting it, once the module is allocated, the
> structures are allocated.
>
> Merge the three per-CPU variables into ovs_pcpu_storage, adapt callers.
>
> Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
> Cc: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-14 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-12 9:27 [PATCH net-next v4 00/15] net: Cover more per-CPU storage with local nested BH locking Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 01/15] net: page_pool: Don't recycle into cache on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 02/15] net: dst_cache: Use nested-BH locking for dst_cache::cache Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 03/15] ipv4/route: Use this_cpu_inc() for stats on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 04/15] ipv6: sr: Use nested-BH locking for hmac_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 05/15] xdp: Use nested-BH locking for system_page_pool Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 06/15] xfrm: Use nested-BH locking for nat_keepalive_sk_ipv[46] Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 07/15] openvswitch: Merge three per-CPU structures into one Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-14 14:13 ` Aaron Conole [this message]
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 08/15] openvswitch: Use nested-BH locking for ovs_pcpu_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-14 14:14 ` [ovs-dev] " Aaron Conole
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 09/15] openvswitch: Move ovs_frag_data_storage into the struct ovs_pcpu_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-14 14:14 ` [ovs-dev] " Aaron Conole
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 10/15] net/sched: act_mirred: Move the recursion counter struct netdev_xmit Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-15 9:55 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-05-15 12:49 ` Juri Lelli
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 11/15] net/sched: Use nested-BH locking for sch_frag_data_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 12/15] mptcp: Use nested-BH locking for hmac_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 13/15] rds: Disable only bottom halves in rds_page_remainder_alloc() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 14/15] rds: Acquire per-CPU pointer within BH disabled section Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 15/15] rds: Use nested-BH locking for rds_page_remainder Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-15 13:40 ` [PATCH net-next v4 00/15] net: Cover more per-CPU storage with local nested BH locking patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7ta57fe0uz.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.