Re: AP6275 / bcm43752 pcie on mainline brcmf

[Andy Green <andy@warmcat.com>]

On 11/24/22 12:22, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 11/24/2022 1:14 PM, Andy Green wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/24/22 09:42, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>> On 11/18/2022 6:41 AM, Andy Green wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/17/22 21:52, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I see. So could you load bcmdhd and provide log. Preferably with 
>>>>> higher debug level. It also has a module parameter for it. I think 
>>>>> it is called dhd_msg_level and please set it to 0x817.
>>>>
>>>> It's here:
>>>>
>>>> https://warmcat.com/ap6275p-dhd-log1.txt
>>>
>>> Hi Andy,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the log. Together with the dhd driver sources I could make 
>>> some sense of it. Perhaps you can try the following hack and see if 
>>> we make it over the first hurdle.
>>
>> OH!  I found that the line below should be count, not sizeof(count).
> 
> Good job! I was testing you obviously. You passed. Nah, I just feel stupid.

No it's great, the point is it directly identified the root cause 
without access to the platform, it's not so easy.

>> ... any way, good job!
> 
> Thanks. Will clean it up and formally submit it. I also had a quick look 
> at the SDIO variant, but not seeing anything obvious there in terms of 
> firmware loading.

I only have the pcie module not the SDIO one.

For the scan situation, he understands what is being asked via 
connmanctl "enable wifi", but he feels something wrong

connmanctl> enable wifi

connmanctl>
Enabled wifi
connmanctl> [  272.174946] ieee80211 phy0: brcmf_run_escan: error (-52)
[  272.174956] ieee80211 phy0: brcmf_cfg80211_scan: scan error (-52)


connmanctl> [  275.133157] ieee80211 phy0: brcmf_run_escan: error (-52)
[  275.133166] ieee80211 phy0: brcmf_cfg80211_scan: scan error (-52)


connmanctl> [  284.138852] ieee80211 phy0: brcmf_run_escan: error (-52)
[  284.138856] ieee80211 phy0: brcmf_cfg80211_scan: scan error (-52)

52 is EBADE, I recall you mentioned that the scan api had been changed 
recently... is this possibly related to that?  Grepping around for EBADE 
near the function it mentions, it tries to take evasive action if it 
sees one in some places already.

-Andy