From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mptcp: clear 'kern' flag from fallback sockets
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 15:04:26 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f89e2257-c2bd-672-ad5b-eb4e6d6cf749@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211210090004.GF26636@breakpoint.cc>
On Fri, 10 Dec 2021, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 6 Dec 2021, Mat Martineau wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 6 Dec 2021, Florian Westphal wrote:
>>>
>>>> The mptcp ULP extension relies on sk->sk_sock_kern being set correctly:
>>>> It prevents setsockopt(fd, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_ULP, "mptcp", 6); from
>>>> working for plain tcp sockets (any userspace-exposed socket).
>>>>
>>>> But in case of fallback, accept() can return a plain tcp sk.
>>>> In such case, sk is still tagged as 'kernel' and setsockopt will work.
>>>>
>>>> This will crash the kernel, The subflow extension has a NULL ctx->conn
>>>> mptcp socket:
>>>>
>>>> BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in subflow_data_ready+0x181/0x2b0
>>>> Call Trace:
>>>> tcp_data_ready+0xf8/0x370
>>>> [..]
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: cf7da0d66cc1 ("mptcp: Create SUBFLOW socket for incoming
>>>> connections")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2: also handle early-return
>>>
>>> Thanks - v2 looks good to me.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 4 +++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
>>>> index 8319e601bc2d..4a8f2476cc75 100644
>>>> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
>>>> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
>>>> @@ -3013,7 +3013,7 @@ static struct sock *mptcp_accept(struct sock
>>>> *sk, int flags, int *err,
>>>> */
>>>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!new_mptcp_sock)) {
>>>> tcp_sk(newsk)->is_mptcp = 0;
>>>> - return newsk;
>>>> + goto out;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /* acquire the 2nd reference for the owning socket */
>>>> @@ -3025,6 +3025,8 @@ static struct sock *mptcp_accept(struct sock
>>>> *sk, int flags, int *err,
>>>> MPTCP_MIB_MPCAPABLEPASSIVEFALLBACK);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +out:
>>>> + newsk->sk_kern_sock = kern;
>>
>> Florian -
>>
>> I was about to upstream this for -net, but have another question first.
>>
>> Is there anything else in newsk that needs to be updated when changing
>> sk_kern_sock? sk_alloc() handles some reference counts differently for kern
>> socks, and sock_lock_init() sets things up differently for lockdep.
>
> AFAICS no.
>
> The tcpsk inherits these settings from its parent (listen) sk, so they
> always have 'kern = 1'.
>
> Even before this change, lock depclass is not correct (kernel, not user).
>
> Need to export code from core to change this.
>
> The netns refcount bump is not needed, but at this point it has already
> happened so even if we undo+clear ->sk_net_refcnt it won't buy anthing.
>
Ok, thanks for the background on the refcounts. I also now see the code in
mtpcp_subflow_create_socket() that already adjusts the refcounts.
> So only alternative I see is to toss this patch and use a different
> sk marker to block mptcp ulp on normal tcp sockets.
>
> This would not change the incorrect lockdep class in this case of course
> but would avoid messing with this.
>
> tp->is_mptcp would come to mind, we only need to set it to 1 before
> adding the mptcp ulp from inside the kernel rather than in the mptcp ulp
> init function.
>
So the question is which inconsistency is better: mismatch between the
lockdep class and sk_kern_sock bit (the original patch for this email
thread), or having a sk_kern_sock=1 socket out in usespace (the proposed
alternative).
Neither seems ideal, but also don't appear to have serious consequences.
For a -net fix now, this patch (clearing the kern bit) seems like the most
straightforward for backporting. The lockdep fix could be handled
independently, as it's a separate existing issue?
I will plan to upstream the existing patches from the export branch on
Monday if there's no objection posted here!
--
Mat Martineau
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-10 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-06 15:51 [PATCH mptcp 0/2] mptcp: fix crash with mptcp-ulp on tcp sockets Florian Westphal
2021-12-06 15:51 ` [PATCH mptcp 1/2] mptcp: clear 'kern' flag from fallback sockets Florian Westphal
2021-12-06 19:40 ` Mat Martineau
2021-12-06 21:26 ` [PATCH v2 " Florian Westphal
2021-12-06 21:49 ` Mat Martineau
2021-12-10 1:38 ` Mat Martineau
2021-12-10 9:00 ` Florian Westphal
2021-12-10 10:46 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-12-10 20:48 ` Mat Martineau
2021-12-10 23:04 ` Mat Martineau [this message]
2021-12-06 15:51 ` [PATCH mptcp 2/2] selftests: mptcp: try to set mptcp ulp mode in different sk states Florian Westphal
2021-12-07 13:57 ` [PATCH mptcp 0/2] mptcp: fix crash with mptcp-ulp on tcp sockets Matthieu Baerts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f89e2257-c2bd-672-ad5b-eb4e6d6cf749@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.