From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/mempolicy: add MPOL_PREFERRED_STRICT memory policy
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 18:53:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9619358-e570-fa29-2599-ac0480ce0df3@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83483424-e617-51c4-d55c-6106e66e2659@linux.intel.com>
On 10/13/21 18:46, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>> The difference with MPOL_BIND is the ability to specify a preferred node
>> which is the first node in the nodemask argument passed.
>
> That's always the one with the lowest number. Isn't that quite limiting
> in practice?
>
> It seems if you really want to do that you would need another argument.
>
Yes. But that would make it a new syscall. Should we do that?
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-13 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-13 9:45 [RFC PATCH] mm/mempolicy: add MPOL_PREFERRED_STRICT memory policy Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-13 10:42 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 10:48 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 12:35 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-13 12:50 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 12:58 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-13 13:07 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 13:10 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-13 14:22 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 13:57 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-13 14:26 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 13:16 ` Andi Kleen
2021-10-13 13:23 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2021-10-13 14:21 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-14 9:30 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-14 9:38 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-14 10:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-14 11:41 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-14 13:29 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-14 14:56 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-14 15:50 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-19 9:38 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f9619358-e570-fa29-2599-ac0480ce0df3@linux.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.