From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: blk-mq: don't clear RQF_MQ_INFLIGHT in blk_mq_rq_ctx_init()
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 10:47:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9ef89da-e05b-ecc6-93fc-ffee7997117f@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180114174356.GA18275@redhat.com>
On 1/14/18 10:43 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14 2018 at 12:38pm -0500,
> Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>
>> On 1/13/18 10:49 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>> In case of no IO scheduler, RQF_MQ_INFLIGHT is set in blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(),
>>> but 7c3fb70f0341 clears it mistakenly, so fix it.
>>
>> Oops yeah, that's my bad. However, I think the below fix is cleaner
>> and avoids a conditional.
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
>> index b3b2003b7429..c8f62e6be6b6 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
>> @@ -269,13 +269,14 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data,
>> {
>> struct blk_mq_tags *tags = blk_mq_tags_from_data(data);
>> struct request *rq = tags->static_rqs[tag];
>> + req_flags_t rq_flags = 0;
>>
>> if (data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_INTERNAL) {
>> rq->tag = -1;
>> rq->internal_tag = tag;
>> } else {
>> if (blk_mq_tag_busy(data->hctx)) {
>> - rq->rq_flags = RQF_MQ_INFLIGHT;
>> + rq_flags = RQF_MQ_INFLIGHT;
>> atomic_inc(&data->hctx->nr_active);
>> }
>> rq->tag = tag;
>> @@ -286,7 +287,7 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data,
>> /* csd/requeue_work/fifo_time is initialized before use */
>> rq->q = data->q;
>> rq->mq_ctx = data->ctx;
>> - rq->rq_flags = 0;
>> + rq->rq_flags = rq_flags;
>> rq->cpu = -1;
>> rq->cmd_flags = op;
>> if (data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT)
>
> Yeap, looks good.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
>
> Defintely need this fix, without it all my dm-mpath testing hangs
Yeah, pretty unfortunate... I've applied it and pushed it out.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-14 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-13 17:49 [PATCH] blk-mq: don't clear RQF_MQ_INFLIGHT in blk_mq_rq_ctx_init() Ming Lei
2018-01-14 17:38 ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-14 17:43 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-14 17:47 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f9ef89da-e05b-ecc6-93fc-ffee7997117f@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.