From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH igt 5/5] igt/perf_pmu: Speed up frequency measurement
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:27:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa125c2d-e0bc-b62c-79c4-e3a46e5f4558@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171222110323.21230-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On 22/12/2017 11:03, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Use the normal batch_duration_ns and display the sampled frequency:
>
> Frequency: min=100, max=750, boost=750 MHz
> Min frequency: requested 100.0, actual 100.0
> Max frequency: requested 755.6, actual 755.6
>
> v2: Remove the early spin_batch_end and assert the measured frequencies
> are within tolerance of our target.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/perf_pmu.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> index d88287c17..eb8791cd4 100644
> --- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
> +++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> @@ -931,9 +931,10 @@ test_interrupts(int gem_fd)
> static void
> test_frequency(int gem_fd)
> {
> - const uint64_t duration_ns = 2e9;
> uint32_t min_freq, max_freq, boost_freq;
> - uint64_t min[2], max[2], start[2];
> + uint64_t val[2], start[2];
> + double min[2], max[2];
> + unsigned long slept;
> igt_spin_t *spin;
> int fd, sysfs;
>
> @@ -962,17 +963,18 @@ test_frequency(int gem_fd)
> igt_require(igt_sysfs_set_u32(sysfs, "gt_boost_freq_mhz", min_freq));
> igt_require(igt_sysfs_get_u32(sysfs, "gt_boost_freq_mhz") == min_freq);
>
> + gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd); /* Idle to be sure the change takes effect */
> + spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0, I915_EXEC_RENDER, 0);
> pmu_read_multi(fd, 2, start);
>
> - spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0, I915_EXEC_RENDER, 0);
> - igt_spin_batch_set_timeout(spin, duration_ns);
> - gem_sync(gem_fd, spin->handle);
> + slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
>
> - pmu_read_multi(fd, 2, min);
> - min[0] -= start[0];
> - min[1] -= start[1];
> + pmu_read_multi(fd, 2, val);
> + min[0] = 1e9*(val[0] - start[0]) / slept;
> + min[1] = 1e9*(val[1] - start[1]) / slept;
>
> igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
> + gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd); /* Don't leak busy bo into the next phase */
>
> usleep(1e6);
>
> @@ -987,17 +989,18 @@ test_frequency(int gem_fd)
> igt_require(igt_sysfs_set_u32(sysfs, "gt_min_freq_mhz", max_freq));
> igt_require(igt_sysfs_get_u32(sysfs, "gt_min_freq_mhz") == max_freq);
>
> + gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd);
> + spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0, I915_EXEC_RENDER, 0);
> pmu_read_multi(fd, 2, start);
>
> - spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0, I915_EXEC_RENDER, 0);
> - igt_spin_batch_set_timeout(spin, duration_ns);
> - gem_sync(gem_fd, spin->handle);
> + slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
>
> - pmu_read_multi(fd, 2, max);
> - max[0] -= start[0];
> - max[1] -= start[1];
> + pmu_read_multi(fd, 2, val);
> + max[0] = 1e9*(val[0] - start[0]) / slept;
> + max[1] = 1e9*(val[1] - start[1]) / slept;
>
> igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
> + gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd);
>
> /*
> * Restore min/max.
> @@ -1008,8 +1011,12 @@ test_frequency(int gem_fd)
> min_freq, igt_sysfs_get_u32(sysfs, "gt_min_freq_mhz"));
> close(fd);
>
> - igt_assert(min[0] < max[0]);
> - igt_assert(min[1] < max[1]);
> + igt_info("Min frequency: requested %.1f, actual %.1f\n",
> + min[0], min[1]);
> + igt_info("Max frequency: requested %.1f, actual %.1f\n",
> + max[0], max[1]);
> + assert_within_epsilon(min[0], min_freq, tolerance);
> + assert_within_epsilon(max[0], max_freq, tolerance);
> }
>
> static bool wait_for_rc6(int fd)
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-22 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-22 11:03 [PATCH igt 1/5] igt/perf_pmu: Tighten busy measurement Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 11:03 ` [PATCH igt 2/5] igt/perf_pmu: Tighten measurements for most-busy Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 13:21 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-12-22 11:03 ` [PATCH igt 3/5] igt/perf_pmu: Measure the reference batch for busy-check-all Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 13:22 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-12-22 11:03 ` [PATCH igt 4/5] igt/perf_pmu: Measure the reference batch for all-busy-check-all Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 13:24 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-12-22 11:03 ` [PATCH igt 5/5] igt/perf_pmu: Speed up frequency measurement Chris Wilson
2017-12-22 13:27 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2017-12-22 12:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/5] igt/perf_pmu: Tighten busy measurement Patchwork
2017-12-22 13:18 ` [PATCH igt 1/5] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-12-22 13:49 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/5] " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa125c2d-e0bc-b62c-79c4-e3a46e5f4558@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.