From: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: eahariha@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: Re: ✗ CI.FULL: failure for Make I2C terminology more inclusive for I2C Algobit and consumers (rev5)
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:59:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa5f5889-1c63-4447-800c-5e11b15feff1@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <172068445813.124810.2466831877853460978@2413ebb6fbb6>
On 7/11/2024 12:54 AM, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: Make I2C terminology more inclusive for I2C Algobit and consumers (rev5)
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/131888/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from xe-1591-36e90f69c967f4cbcdd02c40c9ef25694ffb1a13_full -> xe-pw-131888v5_full
> ====================================================
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with xe-pw-131888v5_full absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in xe-pw-131888v5_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
I took a look at the logs and don't think the regressions below are
connected to my patches. Does anyone disagree?
Thanks,
Easwar
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in xe-pw-131888v5_full:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Possible regressions ####
>
> * igt@kms_atomic:
> - shard-lnl: NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][1]
> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-131888v5/shard-lnl-8/igt@kms_atomic.html
>
> * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc@pipe-b-dp-4:
> - shard-dg2-set2: [PASS][2] -> [DMESG-WARN][3]
> [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-1591-36e90f69c967f4cbcdd02c40c9ef25694ffb1a13/shard-dg2-436/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc@pipe-b-dp-4.html
> [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-131888v5/shard-dg2-464/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc@pipe-b-dp-4.html
>
> * igt@kms_vblank@query-forked:
> - shard-adlp: [PASS][4] -> [DMESG-WARN][5] +1 other test dmesg-warn
> [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-1591-36e90f69c967f4cbcdd02c40c9ef25694ffb1a13/shard-adlp-4/igt@kms_vblank@query-forked.html
> [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-131888v5/shard-adlp-4/igt@kms_vblank@query-forked.html
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-11 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-11 5:27 [PATCH v4 0/6] Make I2C terminology more inclusive for I2C Algobit and consumers Easwar Hariharan
2024-07-11 5:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] drm/amdgpu, drm/radeon: Make I2C terminology more inclusive Easwar Hariharan
2024-07-30 2:03 ` Easwar Hariharan
2024-07-11 5:27 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] drm/gma500: " Easwar Hariharan
2024-07-29 7:41 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-07-11 5:27 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] drm/i915: " Easwar Hariharan
2024-07-11 11:24 ` Andi Shyti
2024-07-18 9:54 ` Andi Shyti
2024-07-22 12:50 ` Andi Shyti
2024-07-22 16:15 ` Easwar Hariharan
2024-07-22 16:27 ` Andi Shyti
2024-07-11 5:27 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] sfc: falcon: " Easwar Hariharan
2024-07-14 0:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-07-11 5:27 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] fbdev/smscufx: " Easwar Hariharan
2024-07-11 10:08 ` Helge Deller
2024-07-11 5:27 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] fbdev/viafb: " Easwar Hariharan
2024-07-11 10:09 ` Helge Deller
2024-07-11 5:58 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Make I2C terminology more inclusive for I2C Algobit and consumers (rev5) Patchwork
2024-07-11 5:58 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-07-11 6:00 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-07-11 6:11 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-07-11 6:14 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-07-11 6:15 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-07-11 6:46 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-07-11 7:04 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning " Patchwork
2024-07-11 7:04 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-07-11 7:13 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-07-11 7:54 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-07-11 17:59 ` Easwar Hariharan [this message]
2024-07-11 11:54 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2024-07-18 10:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Make I2C terminology more inclusive for I2C Algobit and consumers (rev7) Patchwork
2024-07-18 10:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-07-18 10:53 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-07-19 6:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa5f5889-1c63-4447-800c-5e11b15feff1@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=eahariha@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.