From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-8.0 1/3] async: Suppress GCC13 false positive in aio_bh_poll()
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:16:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fabc9edf-697e-41d3-101a-bd7a6ddda84a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1dc87cd2-2f86-3580-3f29-a89de375c79d@redhat.com>
On 3/21/23 12:57, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 3/21/23 09:33, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> +static void aio_bh_slice_insert(AioContext *ctx, BHListSlice *slice)
>> +{
>> + QSIMPLEQ_INSERT_TAIL(&ctx->bh_slice_list, slice, next);
>> +}
>> +
>> /* Multiple occurrences of aio_bh_poll cannot be called concurrently. */
>> int aio_bh_poll(AioContext *ctx)
>> {
>> @@ -164,7 +169,13 @@ int aio_bh_poll(AioContext *ctx)
>> /* Synchronizes with QSLIST_INSERT_HEAD_ATOMIC in aio_bh_enqueue(). */
>> QSLIST_MOVE_ATOMIC(&slice.bh_list, &ctx->bh_list);
>> - QSIMPLEQ_INSERT_TAIL(&ctx->bh_slice_list, &slice, next);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * GCC13 [-Werror=dangling-pointer=] complains that the local variable
>> + * 'slice' is being stored in a global list in 'ctx->bh_slice_list'.
>> + * Use a helper to silent the compiler
>> + */
>> + aio_bh_slice_insert(ctx, &slice);
>> while ((s = QSIMPLEQ_FIRST(&ctx->bh_slice_list))) {
>> QEMUBH *bh;
>> --
>
> Sorry, but an API that has "insert" and not "remove", and where the argument is *expected to be* a local variable (which must be removed to avoid a dangling pointer---and the warning is exactly -Wdangling-pointer), ranks at least -7 in the bad API ranking[1].
:)
> I tried wrapping the BHListSlice and BHListSlice* into an iterator struct (which is also really overkill, but at least---in theory---it's idiomatic), but the code was hard to follow.
>
> The fact that the workaround is so ugly, in my opinion, points even more strongly at the compiler being in the wrong here.
It was initially called slice_dangling_pointer_fixup() how's that ?
An alternative could be :
@@ -164,7 +164,14 @@ int aio_bh_poll(AioContext *ctx)
/* Synchronizes with QSLIST_INSERT_HEAD_ATOMIC in aio_bh_enqueue(). */
QSLIST_MOVE_ATOMIC(&slice.bh_list, &ctx->bh_list);
+ /*
+ * GCC13 [-Werror=dangling-pointer=] complains that the local variable
+ * 'slice' is being stored in the global list 'ctx->bh_slice_list'.
+ */
+#pragma GCC diagnostic push
+#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdangling-pointer="
QSIMPLEQ_INSERT_TAIL(&ctx->bh_slice_list, &slice, next);
+#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
while ((s = QSIMPLEQ_FIRST(&ctx->bh_slice_list))) {
QEMUBH *bh;
May be that's more explicit. I wonder if we need to ifdef clang also.
Thanks,
C.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-21 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-21 8:33 [PATCH for-8.0 0/3] Fixes for GCC13 Cédric Le Goater
2023-03-21 8:33 ` [PATCH for-8.0 1/3] async: Suppress GCC13 false positive in aio_bh_poll() Cédric Le Goater
2023-03-21 10:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-03-21 10:30 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-21 10:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-03-21 11:15 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-03-21 11:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-03-21 12:16 ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2023-03-21 13:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-03-21 8:33 ` [PATCH for-8.0 2/3] target/s390x: Fix float_comp_to_cc() prototype Cédric Le Goater
2023-03-21 9:37 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-22 3:48 ` Richard Henderson
2023-03-22 6:51 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-21 8:33 ` [PATCH for-8.0 3/3] target/ppc: Fix helper_pminsn() prototype Cédric Le Goater
2023-03-21 11:07 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2023-03-22 3:49 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fabc9edf-697e-41d3-101a-bd7a6ddda84a@redhat.com \
--to=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.