RE: [PATCH 4/5] net/bnxt: use fp ops setup function

[Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>]

> Use rte_eth_fp_ops_setup() instead of directly manipulating
> rte_eth_fp_ops variable.
> 
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_cpr.c    | 5 +----
>  drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c | 5 +----
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_cpr.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_cpr.c
> index 3950840600..a3f33c24c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_cpr.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_cpr.c
> @@ -416,10 +416,7 @@ void bnxt_stop_rxtx(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
>  	eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst = rte_eth_pkt_burst_dummy;
>  	eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst = rte_eth_pkt_burst_dummy;

I am not that familiar with bnxt driver, but shouldn't we set here
other optional fp_ops (descripto_status, etc.) to some dummy values OR to null values?
 
> 
> -	rte_eth_fp_ops[eth_dev->data->port_id].rx_pkt_burst =
> -		eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst;
> -	rte_eth_fp_ops[eth_dev->data->port_id].tx_pkt_burst =
> -		eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst;
> +	rte_eth_fp_ops_setup(eth_dev);
>  	rte_mb();
> 
>  	/* Allow time for threads to exit the real burst functions. */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
> index 4083a69d02..d6064ceea4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c
> @@ -4374,10 +4374,7 @@ static void bnxt_dev_recover(void *arg)
>  	if (rc)
>  		goto err_start;
> 
> -	rte_eth_fp_ops[bp->eth_dev->data->port_id].rx_pkt_burst =
> -		bp->eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst;
> -	rte_eth_fp_ops[bp->eth_dev->data->port_id].tx_pkt_burst =
> -		bp->eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst;
> +	rte_eth_fp_ops_setup(bp->eth_dev);
>  	rte_mb();
> 
>  	PMD_DRV_LOG(INFO, "Port: %u Recovered from FW reset\n",
> --
> 2.17.1