From: Wenji Wu <wenji@fnal.gov>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Cc: 'John Heffner' <johnwheffner@gmail.com>,
'Netdev' <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RE: A Linux TCP SACK Question
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:40:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbdee7bf38be.47f65a14@fnal.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804050031400.8186@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi>
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Wenji Wu wrote:
>
> >
> > >I'd suggest that you don't waste too much effort for 2.6.24.
> ...Most of it
> > >is recoded/updated since then.
> >
> > I just tried it on 2.6.25-rc8. The result is still the same: the throughput
> > with SACK on is less than with SACK off.
>
> Hmm, can you also try if playing around with FRTO setting makes some
> difference (tcp_frto sysctl)?
Still the same, I just tried with FRTO, FACK. No difference, SACK on is worse than SACK off.
wenji
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-04 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-04 4:54 A Linux TCP SACK Question Wenji Wu
2008-04-04 16:27 ` John Heffner
2008-04-04 17:49 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-04 18:07 ` John Heffner
2008-04-04 20:00 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-04-04 20:07 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-04 21:15 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-04 21:33 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-04-04 21:39 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-04-04 22:14 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-05 17:42 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-04-05 21:17 ` Sangtae Ha
2008-04-06 20:27 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-06 22:43 ` Sangtae Ha
2008-04-07 14:56 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-08 6:36 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-04-08 12:33 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-08 13:45 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-04-08 14:30 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-08 14:59 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-04-08 15:27 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-08 17:26 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-04-14 22:47 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-15 0:48 ` John Heffner
2008-04-15 8:25 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-04-15 18:01 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-15 22:40 ` John Heffner
2008-04-16 8:27 ` David Miller
2008-04-16 9:21 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-04-16 9:35 ` David Miller
2008-04-16 14:50 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-18 6:52 ` David Miller
2008-08-27 14:38 ` about Linux adaptivly adjusting ssthresh Wenji Wu
2008-08-27 22:48 ` John Heffner
2008-08-28 0:53 ` Wenji Wu
2008-08-28 6:34 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-08-28 14:20 ` about Linux adaptivly adjusting dupthresh Wenji Wu
2008-08-28 18:53 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-08-28 19:30 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-16 14:40 ` A Linux TCP SACK Question John Heffner
2008-04-16 15:03 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-04-16 14:46 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-15 15:45 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-15 16:39 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-15 17:01 ` John Heffner
2008-04-15 17:08 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-04-15 17:23 ` John Heffner
2008-04-15 18:00 ` Matt Mathis
2008-04-15 17:55 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-08 15:57 ` John Heffner
2008-04-08 14:07 ` John Heffner
2008-04-14 16:10 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-14 16:48 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-04-14 22:07 ` Wenji Wu
2008-04-15 8:23 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-04-04 21:40 ` Wenji Wu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fbdee7bf38be.47f65a14@fnal.gov \
--to=wenji@fnal.gov \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=johnwheffner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.