From: Manuel Reimer <Manuel.Spam@nurfuerspam.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: udev: Inconsistency between %b and %p?
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:05:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbppo0$rli$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jeodgfu6pz.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> As I would prefer to use the USB device information (idVendor, idProduct)
>> to detect the device, I also tried this one:
>>
>> ATTRS{idVendor}=="0dda", ATTRS{idProduct}=="2005", SUBSYSTEM=="scsi",
>> ACTION=="add", PROGRAM+="/usr/bin/test.sh %b %p"
>>
>> Now this version returns the USB device ID ($NUM-$NUM) to the test script,
>> but the device path (%p) is still OK and still goes down up to the SCSI
>> device ID.
>>
>> Why does %b not return the SCSI device ID in the second rule?
>
> Because ATTRS has matched the USB device, not the SCSI device.
Yes, that's right, but "SUBSYSTEM" matched the SCSI device...
If I use udevinfo, then this tool tells me:
| A rule to match, can be composed by the attributes of the device
| and the attributes from one single parent device.
So I thought, that I've matched the SCSI device now. To prove this, I
just replaced "SUBSYSTEM=="scsi"" with "SUBSYSTEM=="usb"" and removed
the "S" in the "ATTRS" of the above rule, and now, I get the USB-device
in %b (as expected) and the path in %p only goes down up to the USB
device ID.
So, if all rules match for the same device, then %b and %p are both
pointing to this, right, device.
If I try to match, using one of the parent devices (using the "S"
"extension" to the property names) and the device, to match to, itself,
then the two are inconsistent. Then, %b holds the device name of the
parent and %p holds the patch of the device, I want to match.
For me, this looks like a bug, or am I wrong?
Yours
Manuel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-06 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-06 15:33 udev: Inconsistency between %b and %p? Manuel Reimer
2007-09-06 15:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-09-06 21:05 ` Manuel Reimer [this message]
2007-09-06 21:46 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-09-06 21:59 ` Manuel Reimer
2007-09-07 1:03 ` Kay Sievers
2007-09-11 14:11 ` Manuel Reimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='fbppo0$rli$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=manuel.spam@nurfuerspam.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.