From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FD8AC47074 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 08:55:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From :Date:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=rMO/d72aXYxWrHh+dZXTjHCQbvIR8pHjh+WqzqHju9Q=; b=EcVTOOLflJO4sFhjt+zXjfuFOE XNeVOMuV3D4dp+eFFClmQe24gs4Qw6u5thcZY6QNGALX00Z6S1/FemxiFIceUKijdq686MOd+jdwA N4IlRdAIV9HHSkJcSxYfkLrzjcf7UPYBwj4+3fz/ttOyF4VZnCl2xMKTVBLC5emEkZWC0HtlgV3A1 TP7tWhEA08cuqVK4+NHLb+GimoMKhJ+qaiXpl5VszVJ6QtnNrgJKwOfA1eqMm5pqXIc6vxLKqCAcJ Gc3a7+BnE/YmewIlDfCgjci4xY/0Eb0QYRnRfO4wU8GFkUtgI+PCNOsOlgTSO/aF/1tirH0Ad5oWU TzfCT+wA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rLJVt-00DHMF-2X; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 08:55:41 +0000 Received: from mail.manjaro.org ([2a01:4f8:c0c:51f3::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rLJVq-00DHLX-1Q; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 08:55:39 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1704358536; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pbNALQpXNCDpGEp9DXfwz7sC6bAlhKRk9rvFEXGRAhA=; b=NMc4BmLiSHOfYytOUBp+Yj92EzTSfGqkiB5eJORd8m14T0IOlqtCU3/qsEcOgz7LfvKD1W Mnwex3uDFaZ4do0I30D+FA715QAjNv7oIYBktlFArv2W6gsaQtigf6XLg2GeGzURi4WDyG A+isAVLqz7G+nfEgT2/UHuh2ZyUs7VyhVIVkYZyfI+jVluv0d9AIVySnrvzwKPBpMRFTT8 fRxfzeqx2XVPq0G1FKBxy+OuY/fv12GhDPgbH+oZPfXsWV1c00lVSpU5/3wxb0NAETPWYG ANTJSUQwKhldoOMFQjjHOdRGYdmbz3AudIEjC5lqBmMFMxcI2Gw5FiWuaEx0qQ== Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 09:55:35 +0100 From: Dragan Simic To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, heiko@sntech.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Kyle Copperfield Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add cache information to the SoC dtsi for RK3399 In-Reply-To: <0476656a-6d3d-4662-879a-1caf0efb4d9e@linaro.org> References: <665196c24beafec415e4a3123cc625c8@manjaro.org> <0476656a-6d3d-4662-879a-1caf0efb4d9e@linaro.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240104_005538_650146_682A1F83 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.26 ) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2024-01-04 09:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 04/01/2024 09:50, Dragan Simic wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Just checking, is there something preventing this patch from becoming >> accepted? I'd appreciate if you'd provide some feedback and let me >> know >> if there's something in the patch that needs adjusting. > > Merge window? Is it a fix? If not, the cutoff is around rc5-rc7, > depending on your SoC maintainer preferences. Ah, I see, thanks for the clarification. It isn't a bugfix, so I'll send the patch again during the next merge window. _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D2B5C47073 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 08:56:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From :Date:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=eOTYy5I+dXQroFXsWLzj+8605eCHqG8v30QKnHawl60=; b=4uucN9x9dibqxsSIoQK5Ls6s6/ YxKOlQ+dkiCAMiFKGYQqcZFPkmux0us9b8alm0SBFg+WZsi2X1IVWzbBCfWqw8jBecSTDgTGskrNg ZhB/rXpyu/odU6V3rLVnCLZylgSobjJIlrzIKkz42vsoonKkgVYhC1G5jhH50A+ynE2RvT5/17jze jOxVXF3/giC+R5aHFqkbqMkqdYf5o3bORfbXe2TLyKh1c0E5G3LyLlOgP2+MNJf0YHx1esLuf6grn UoPF+Ey/p1wCMdnMwChA74836GU/an+wOYZpO0LHVFVZzuo9eQzbSqjutKn/3D8LWhj44ywIyY9YF fojcRnKw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rLJVt-00DHM8-0w; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 08:55:41 +0000 Received: from mail.manjaro.org ([2a01:4f8:c0c:51f3::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rLJVq-00DHLX-1Q; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 08:55:39 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1704358536; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pbNALQpXNCDpGEp9DXfwz7sC6bAlhKRk9rvFEXGRAhA=; b=NMc4BmLiSHOfYytOUBp+Yj92EzTSfGqkiB5eJORd8m14T0IOlqtCU3/qsEcOgz7LfvKD1W Mnwex3uDFaZ4do0I30D+FA715QAjNv7oIYBktlFArv2W6gsaQtigf6XLg2GeGzURi4WDyG A+isAVLqz7G+nfEgT2/UHuh2ZyUs7VyhVIVkYZyfI+jVluv0d9AIVySnrvzwKPBpMRFTT8 fRxfzeqx2XVPq0G1FKBxy+OuY/fv12GhDPgbH+oZPfXsWV1c00lVSpU5/3wxb0NAETPWYG ANTJSUQwKhldoOMFQjjHOdRGYdmbz3AudIEjC5lqBmMFMxcI2Gw5FiWuaEx0qQ== Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 09:55:35 +0100 From: Dragan Simic To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, heiko@sntech.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Kyle Copperfield Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add cache information to the SoC dtsi for RK3399 In-Reply-To: <0476656a-6d3d-4662-879a-1caf0efb4d9e@linaro.org> References: <665196c24beafec415e4a3123cc625c8@manjaro.org> <0476656a-6d3d-4662-879a-1caf0efb4d9e@linaro.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240104_005538_650146_682A1F83 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.26 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2024-01-04 09:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 04/01/2024 09:50, Dragan Simic wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Just checking, is there something preventing this patch from becoming >> accepted? I'd appreciate if you'd provide some feedback and let me >> know >> if there's something in the patch that needs adjusting. > > Merge window? Is it a fix? If not, the cutoff is around rc5-rc7, > depending on your SoC maintainer preferences. Ah, I see, thanks for the clarification. It isn't a bugfix, so I'll send the patch again during the next merge window. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.manjaro.org (mail.manjaro.org [116.203.91.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C98481EA90 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 08:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b="NMc4BmLi" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1704358536; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pbNALQpXNCDpGEp9DXfwz7sC6bAlhKRk9rvFEXGRAhA=; b=NMc4BmLiSHOfYytOUBp+Yj92EzTSfGqkiB5eJORd8m14T0IOlqtCU3/qsEcOgz7LfvKD1W Mnwex3uDFaZ4do0I30D+FA715QAjNv7oIYBktlFArv2W6gsaQtigf6XLg2GeGzURi4WDyG A+isAVLqz7G+nfEgT2/UHuh2ZyUs7VyhVIVkYZyfI+jVluv0d9AIVySnrvzwKPBpMRFTT8 fRxfzeqx2XVPq0G1FKBxy+OuY/fv12GhDPgbH+oZPfXsWV1c00lVSpU5/3wxb0NAETPWYG ANTJSUQwKhldoOMFQjjHOdRGYdmbz3AudIEjC5lqBmMFMxcI2Gw5FiWuaEx0qQ== Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 09:55:35 +0100 From: Dragan Simic To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, heiko@sntech.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Kyle Copperfield Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add cache information to the SoC dtsi for RK3399 In-Reply-To: <0476656a-6d3d-4662-879a-1caf0efb4d9e@linaro.org> References: <665196c24beafec415e4a3123cc625c8@manjaro.org> <0476656a-6d3d-4662-879a-1caf0efb4d9e@linaro.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org On 2024-01-04 09:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 04/01/2024 09:50, Dragan Simic wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Just checking, is there something preventing this patch from becoming >> accepted? I'd appreciate if you'd provide some feedback and let me >> know >> if there's something in the patch that needs adjusting. > > Merge window? Is it a fix? If not, the cutoff is around rc5-rc7, > depending on your SoC maintainer preferences. Ah, I see, thanks for the clarification. It isn't a bugfix, so I'll send the patch again during the next merge window.