diff for duplicates of <fc254547-5926-4cb9-98e1-7a79f7284e30@default> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index e2761d6..0a8d19f 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:58:03AM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > > > CHRISTOPH AND ANDREW, if you disagree and your concerns have > > > not been resolved, please speak up. ->=20 +> > Hi Christoph -- ->=20 +> > Thanks very much for the quick (instantaneous?) reply! ->=20 +> > > Anything that need modification of a normal non-shared fs is utterly > > broken and you'll get a clear NAK, so the propsal before is a good > > one. ->=20 +> > No, the per-fs opt-in is very sensible; and its design is > very minimal. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 4cbb3d7..ce5e468 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -33,15 +33,15 @@ "> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:58:03AM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote:\n" "> > > CHRISTOPH AND ANDREW, if you disagree and your concerns have\n" "> > > not been resolved, please speak up.\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> Hi Christoph --\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> Thanks very much for the quick (instantaneous?) reply!\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> > Anything that need modification of a normal non-shared fs is utterly\n" "> > broken and you'll get a clear NAK, so the propsal before is a good\n" "> > one.\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> No, the per-fs opt-in is very sensible; and its design is\n" "> very minimal.\n" "\n" @@ -64,4 +64,4 @@ "see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .\n" "Don't email: <a href=mailto:\"dont@kvack.org\"> email@kvack.org </a>" -55e03c86d994942493665c6002af29b6a32d1bf097acc04a0aa6e175aec12f57 +9fce35b7a71f764d2e020f5b45397f45ed86d9baacd9274b01236a1d6d889ca6
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index e2761d6..795a933 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:58:03AM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > > > CHRISTOPH AND ANDREW, if you disagree and your concerns have > > > not been resolved, please speak up. ->=20 +> > Hi Christoph -- ->=20 +> > Thanks very much for the quick (instantaneous?) reply! ->=20 +> > > Anything that need modification of a normal non-shared fs is utterly > > broken and you'll get a clear NAK, so the propsal before is a good > > one. ->=20 +> > No, the per-fs opt-in is very sensible; and its design is > very minimal. @@ -25,9 +25,3 @@ can utilize cleancache simply by making a call to cleancache_init_fs at mount time. Unusual, misbehaving, or poorly layered filesystems must either add additional hooks and/or undergo extensive additional testing... or should just not enable the optional cleancache. - --- -To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in -the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, -see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . -Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 4cbb3d7..7bcf352 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ "ref\0840b32ff-a303-468e-9d4e-30fc92f629f8@default 20100723140440.GA12423@infradead.org 364c83bd-ccb2-48cc-920d-ffcf9ca7df19@default\0" "ref\0364c83bd-ccb2-48cc-920d-ffcf9ca7df19@default\0" "From\0Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>\0" - "Subject\0RE: [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview\0" + "Subject\0[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview\0" "Date\0Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:17:31 -0700 (PDT)\0" "To\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>\0" "Cc\0ngupta@vflare.org" @@ -33,15 +33,15 @@ "> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:58:03AM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote:\n" "> > > CHRISTOPH AND ANDREW, if you disagree and your concerns have\n" "> > > not been resolved, please speak up.\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> Hi Christoph --\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> Thanks very much for the quick (instantaneous?) reply!\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> > Anything that need modification of a normal non-shared fs is utterly\n" "> > broken and you'll get a clear NAK, so the propsal before is a good\n" "> > one.\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> No, the per-fs opt-in is very sensible; and its design is\n" "> very minimal.\n" "\n" @@ -56,12 +56,6 @@ "can utilize cleancache simply by making a call to cleancache_init_fs\n" "at mount time. Unusual, misbehaving, or poorly layered filesystems\n" "must either add additional hooks and/or undergo extensive additional\n" - "testing... or should just not enable the optional cleancache.\n" - "\n" - "--\n" - "To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in\n" - "the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,\n" - "see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .\n" - "Don't email: <a href=mailto:\"dont@kvack.org\"> email@kvack.org </a>" + testing... or should just not enable the optional cleancache. -55e03c86d994942493665c6002af29b6a32d1bf097acc04a0aa6e175aec12f57 +65c6cfe42555468b15cc436546e2c26f3b87bc528b55fb8fd03a35f5b94fe486
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt index e2761d6..795a933 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N3/1.txt @@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:58:03AM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > > > CHRISTOPH AND ANDREW, if you disagree and your concerns have > > > not been resolved, please speak up. ->=20 +> > Hi Christoph -- ->=20 +> > Thanks very much for the quick (instantaneous?) reply! ->=20 +> > > Anything that need modification of a normal non-shared fs is utterly > > broken and you'll get a clear NAK, so the propsal before is a good > > one. ->=20 +> > No, the per-fs opt-in is very sensible; and its design is > very minimal. @@ -25,9 +25,3 @@ can utilize cleancache simply by making a call to cleancache_init_fs at mount time. Unusual, misbehaving, or poorly layered filesystems must either add additional hooks and/or undergo extensive additional testing... or should just not enable the optional cleancache. - --- -To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in -the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, -see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . -Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest index 4cbb3d7..1223b33 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N3/content_digest @@ -33,15 +33,15 @@ "> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:58:03AM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote:\n" "> > > CHRISTOPH AND ANDREW, if you disagree and your concerns have\n" "> > > not been resolved, please speak up.\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> Hi Christoph --\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> Thanks very much for the quick (instantaneous?) reply!\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> > Anything that need modification of a normal non-shared fs is utterly\n" "> > broken and you'll get a clear NAK, so the propsal before is a good\n" "> > one.\n" - ">=20\n" + "> \n" "> No, the per-fs opt-in is very sensible; and its design is\n" "> very minimal.\n" "\n" @@ -56,12 +56,6 @@ "can utilize cleancache simply by making a call to cleancache_init_fs\n" "at mount time. Unusual, misbehaving, or poorly layered filesystems\n" "must either add additional hooks and/or undergo extensive additional\n" - "testing... or should just not enable the optional cleancache.\n" - "\n" - "--\n" - "To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in\n" - "the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,\n" - "see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .\n" - "Don't email: <a href=mailto:\"dont@kvack.org\"> email@kvack.org </a>" + testing... or should just not enable the optional cleancache. -55e03c86d994942493665c6002af29b6a32d1bf097acc04a0aa6e175aec12f57 +d5633b1a87e55cbced7e251fb373b45ebefb0d910b65dff2a9a58f93c8065b72
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.