From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, khilman@deeprootsystems.com,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/5] Split powerdomain framework into plat specific/independent
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:16:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc2efdf7d5755cb6f22dd575674e7f27@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1012030139020.17078@utopia.booyaka.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul@pwsan.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 2:11 PM
> To: Rajendra Nayak
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; khilman@deeprootsystems.com; Benoit
Cousson
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/5] Split powerdomain framework into plat
specific/independent
>
> Hi Rajendra,
>
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
> > This seems to be popping up with powerdomains.h file (which now
> > has func declarations) being included in multiple source files. It
earlier
> > had only static structs and was included in one source file.
> >
> > I thought the right way to fix this was to probably move the static
> > structs from the header into a source file.
> > See if the below patch makes sense. Also attached as I don't trust
> > my mailer.
>
> Yes, that general approach looks fine to me. I've got some patches here
> that will be posted once this powerdomain series is done to convert all
> the remaining static allocations in .h files into .c files.
Ok, so I'll repost the series with this patch included as well so that
the warnings are'nt thrown anymore.
>
>
> - Paul
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-03 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-30 15:44 [PATCH v2 0/5] Split powerdomain framework into plat specific/independent Rajendra Nayak
2010-11-30 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] OMAP: powerdomain: Infrastructure to put arch specific code Rajendra Nayak
2010-11-30 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] OMAP: powerdomain: Arch specific funcs for state control Rajendra Nayak
2010-11-30 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] OMAP: powerdomain: Arch specific funcs for logic control Rajendra Nayak
2010-11-30 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] OMAP: powerdomain: Arch specific funcs for mem control Rajendra Nayak
2010-11-30 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] OMAP4: powerdomain: Add pwrdm_clear_all_prev_pwrst Rajendra Nayak
2010-12-01 20:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Split powerdomain framework into plat specific/independent Paul Walmsley
2010-12-02 12:35 ` Rajendra Nayak
2010-12-03 8:40 ` Paul Walmsley
2010-12-03 8:46 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc2efdf7d5755cb6f22dd575674e7f27@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.