From: "Peng Hongchi/彭洪驰" <hongchi.peng@siengine.com>
To: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Cc: "maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com"
<maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"mripard@kernel.org" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"tzimmermann@suse.de" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"airlied@gmail.com" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"daniel@ffwll.ch" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: 回复: [PATCH] drm: komeda: Fix an issue related to normalized zpos
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 02:53:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc7e28adc9c240cba4217fd80c3e318a@siengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZsdFp5Nq25q8rrVP@e110455-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Hi, Liviu,
I'm sorry for my carelessness and thanks for your correction, the corrected patch is as follows.
And we do have an extra patch to set layer_split, but this part of the code is owned by my colleague,
So that I cannot upload it, sorry about this.
Signed-off-by: hongchi.peng <hongchi.peng@siengine.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c
index fe46b0ebefea..ab769a0a4afa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c
@@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ static int komeda_crtc_normalize_zpos(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
struct drm_plane *plane;
struct list_head zorder_list;
int order = 0, err;
+ u32 slave_zpos;
DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[CRTC:%d:%s] calculating normalized zpos values\n",
crtc->base.id, crtc->name);
@@ -199,10 +200,13 @@ static int komeda_crtc_normalize_zpos(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
plane_st->zpos, plane_st->normalized_zpos);
/* calculate max slave zorder */
- if (has_bit(drm_plane_index(plane), kcrtc->slave_planes))
+ if (has_bit(drm_plane_index(plane), kcrtc->slave_planes)) {
+ slave_zpos = plane_st->normalized_zpos;
+ if (to_kplane_st(plane_st)->layer_split)
+ slave_zpos++;
kcrtc_st->max_slave_zorder =
- max(plane_st->normalized_zpos,
- kcrtc_st->max_slave_zorder);
+ max(slave_zpos, kcrtc_st->max_slave_zorder);
+ }
}
crtc_st->zpos_changed = true;
--
2.34.1
Best Regards,
Hongchi Peng
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
发送时间: 2024年8月22日 22:05
收件人: Peng Hongchi/彭洪驰 <hongchi.peng@siengine.com>
抄送: maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com; mripard@kernel.org; tzimmermann@suse.de; airlied@gmail.com; daniel@ffwll.ch; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
主题: Re: [PATCH] drm: komeda: Fix an issue related to normalized zpos
Hi Hongchi,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 04:56:13PM +0800, hongchi.peng wrote:
> We use komeda_crtc_normalize_zpos to normalize zpos of affected planes
> to their blending zorder in CU. If there's only one slave plane in
> affected planes and its layer_split property is enabled, order++ for
> its split layer, so that when calculating the normalized_zpos of
> master planes, the split layer of the slave plane is included, but the
> max_slave_zorder does not include the split layer and keep zero
> because there's only one slave plane in affacted planes, although we
> actually use two slave layers in this commit.
>
> In most cases, this bug does not result in a commit failure, but
> assume the following situation:
> slave_layer 0: zpos = 0, layer split enabled, normalized_zpos =
> 0;(use slave_layer 2 as its split layer)
> master_layer 0: zpos = 2, layer_split enabled, normalized_zpos =
> 2;(use master_layer 2 as its split layer)
> master_layer 1: zpos = 4, normalized_zpos = 4;
> master_layer 3: zpos = 5, normalized_zpos = 5;
> kcrtc_st->max_slave_zorder = 0;
> When we use master_layer 3 as a input of CU in function
> komeda_compiz_set_input and check it with function
> komeda_component_check_input, the parameter idx is equal to
> normailzed_zpos minus max_slave_zorder, the value of idx is 5 and is
> euqal to CU's max_active_inputs, so that komeda_component_check_input
> returns a -EINVAL value.
Yes, indeed, you have found a bug in the calculations when layer_split is set.
But I was also looking through the code trying to find where layer_split gets set and I could not find it, do you have some extra patches?
>
> To fix the bug described above, when calculating the max_slave_zorder
> with the layer_split enabled, count the split layer in this
> calculation directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: hongchi.peng <hongchi.peng@siengine.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c
> index fe46b0ebefea..b3db828284e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_kms.c
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static int komeda_crtc_normalize_zpos(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> struct drm_plane_state *plane_st;
> struct drm_plane *plane;
> struct list_head zorder_list;
> - int order = 0, err;
> + int order = 0, slave_zpos, err;
Also, the build bot has already flagged it, your patch needs some improvements.
slave_zpos needs to be u32 if it's going to be compared against max_slave_zorder.
Best regards,
Liviu
>
> DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[CRTC:%d:%s] calculating normalized zpos values\n",
> crtc->base.id, crtc->name);
> @@ -199,10 +199,13 @@ static int komeda_crtc_normalize_zpos(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> plane_st->zpos, plane_st->normalized_zpos);
>
> /* calculate max slave zorder */
> - if (has_bit(drm_plane_index(plane), kcrtc->slave_planes))
> + if (has_bit(drm_plane_index(plane), kcrtc->slave_planes)) {
> + slave_zpos = plane_st->normalized_zpos;
> + if (to_kplane_st(plane_st)->layer_split)
> + slave_zpos++;
> kcrtc_st->max_slave_zorder =
> - max(plane_st->normalized_zpos,
> - kcrtc_st->max_slave_zorder);
> + max(slave_zpos, kcrtc_st->max_slave_zorder);
> + }
> }
>
> crtc_st->zpos_changed = true;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-23 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-21 8:56 [PATCH] drm: komeda: Fix an issue related to normalized zpos hongchi.peng
2024-08-22 10:38 ` kernel test robot
2024-08-22 13:32 ` kernel test robot
2024-08-22 14:05 ` Liviu Dudau
2024-08-23 2:53 ` Peng Hongchi/彭洪驰 [this message]
2024-08-24 12:32 ` 回复: " Liviu Dudau
2024-08-26 2:39 ` 回复: " Peng Hongchi/彭洪驰
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-08-21 8:19 hongchi.peng
2024-08-21 8:41 ` 回复: " Peng Hongchi/彭洪驰
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc7e28adc9c240cba4217fd80c3e318a@siengine.com \
--to=hongchi.peng@siengine.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.