From: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
To: "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] sequencer: avoid empty lines after 'update-ref' instructions
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:18:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc887b02-191e-912a-bd15-1dc882ddf9dc@github.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220930140948.80367-5-szeder.dev@gmail.com>
On 9/30/2022 10:09 AM, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> When the sequencer generates a todo list for 'git rebase
> --update-refs', it always inserts an empty line after each
> 'update-ref' instruction and after each comment line about checked out
> refs. These empty lines are unnecessary, distracting, and waste
> valuable vertical screen real estate, especially when multiple refs
> point to the same commit:
>
> pick 29a79f8 two
> pick 74bf293 three
> # Ref refs/heads/branch3 checked out at '/tmp/test/WT'
>
> update-ref refs/heads/branch2
>
> update-ref refs/heads/branch1
>
> pick 5f59b82 four
>
> Eliminate those empty lines.
After this change, I think the end result is this:
pick 29a79f8 two
pick 74bf293 three
# Ref refs/heads/branch3 checked out at '/tmp/test/WT'
update-ref refs/heads/branch2
update-ref refs/heads/branch1
pick 5f59b82 four
Specifically, there is no whitespace break between the last
'update-ref' command and the next 'pick' command. Since the
'update-ref' commands likely correspond to chunks of changes,
it would be nice to still have that whitespace remain. I
agree that the whitespace between the comments and previous
'update-ref' commands is wasteful, but I'd rather leave the
wasteful (and usually rare) whitespace than lose the helpful
whitespace.
There is precedent for this kind of whitespace when using
'--rebase-merges'.
If you can find a nice way to add a line of whitespace between
these lines and the next instruction type, then I fully
support this change.
Thanks,
-Stolee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-30 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-30 14:09 [PATCH 0/6] rebase --update-refs: smooth out some rough edges SZEDER Gábor
2022-09-30 14:09 ` [PATCH 1/6] t2407-worktree-heads.sh: remove outdated loop SZEDER Gábor
2022-09-30 14:09 ` [PATCH 2/6] t3404-rebase-interactive: mark a test with REFFILES prereq SZEDER Gábor
2022-09-30 16:46 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-10-05 16:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-09-30 14:09 ` [PATCH 3/6] rebase -i: emphasize that 'update-ref' expects a fully-qualified ref SZEDER Gábor
2022-09-30 14:09 ` [PATCH 4/6] sequencer: avoid empty lines after 'update-ref' instructions SZEDER Gábor
2022-09-30 17:18 ` Derrick Stolee [this message]
2022-10-05 16:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-09-30 14:09 ` [PATCH 5/6] sequencer: duplicate the result of resolve_ref_unsafe() SZEDER Gábor
2022-09-30 16:45 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-09-30 16:51 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-09-30 17:23 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-10-09 17:23 ` SZEDER Gábor
2022-09-30 14:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] sequencer: fail early if invalid ref is given to 'update-ref' instruction SZEDER Gábor
2022-09-30 17:09 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-09-30 17:29 ` [PATCH 0/6] rebase --update-refs: smooth out some rough edges Derrick Stolee
2022-10-01 16:31 ` SZEDER Gábor
2022-10-01 16:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-10-05 17:14 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc887b02-191e-912a-bd15-1dc882ddf9dc@github.com \
--to=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.