All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	ast@kernel.org, song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	andrii@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/7] bpf: enable detaching links of struct_ops objects.
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 18:22:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcae9370-82ab-4c2f-90f5-e3a704f6d11c@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240510002942.1253354-3-thinker.li@gmail.com>

On 5/9/24 5:29 PM, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
> +static int bpf_struct_ops_map_link_detach(struct bpf_link *link)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_struct_ops_link *st_link = container_of(link, struct bpf_struct_ops_link, link);
> +	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map;
> +	struct bpf_map *map;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&update_mutex);
> +
> +	map = rcu_dereference_protected(st_link->map, lockdep_is_held(&update_mutex));
> +	if (!map) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&update_mutex);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	st_map = container_of(map, struct bpf_struct_ops_map, map);
> +
> +	st_map->st_ops_desc->st_ops->unreg(&st_map->kvalue.data, link);
> +
> +	rcu_assign_pointer(st_link->map, NULL);
> +	/* Pair with bpf_map_get() in bpf_struct_ops_link_create() or
> +	 * bpf_map_inc() in bpf_struct_ops_map_link_update().
> +	 */
> +	bpf_map_put(&st_map->map);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&update_mutex);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static const struct bpf_link_ops bpf_struct_ops_map_lops = {
>   	.dealloc = bpf_struct_ops_map_link_dealloc,
> +	.detach = bpf_struct_ops_map_link_detach,
>   	.show_fdinfo = bpf_struct_ops_map_link_show_fdinfo,
>   	.fill_link_info = bpf_struct_ops_map_link_fill_link_info,
>   	.update_map = bpf_struct_ops_map_link_update,
> @@ -1176,13 +1208,19 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_link_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
>   	if (err)
>   		goto err_out;
>   
> +	/* Init link->map before calling reg() in case being detached
> +	 * immediately.
> +	 */

It is not obvious in the patch how this (immediate detach by subsystem after 
reg) may work without race, so I think it is easier to ask.

[ I put back the err_out context at the end ]

> +	RCU_INIT_POINTER(link->map, map);
> +
>   	err = st_map->st_ops_desc->st_ops->reg(st_map->kvalue.data, &link->link);
>   	if (err) {
> +		RCU_INIT_POINTER(link->map, NULL);

In the bpf_struct_ops_map_link_detach() above, the update to link->map is 
protected by the update_mutex. Could you explain how the link->map update to 
NULL is safe here without holding the update_mutex?

>   		bpf_link_cleanup(&link_primer);
> +		/* The link has been free by bpf_link_cleanup() */
>   		link = NULL;
>   		goto err_out;
>   	}
> -	RCU_INIT_POINTER(link->map, map);
>   
>   	return bpf_link_settle(&link_primer);
>

err_out:
	bpf_map_put(map);
	kfree(link);
	return err;
}



  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-21  1:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-10  0:29 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/7] Notify user space when a struct_ops object is detached/unregistered Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-10  0:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/7] bpf: pass bpf_struct_ops_link to callbacks in bpf_struct_ops Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-10  0:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/7] bpf: enable detaching links of struct_ops objects Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-21  1:22   ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-05-21  7:30     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-21 18:09       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-05-10  0:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/7] bpf: support epoll from bpf struct_ops links Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-21  1:26   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-05-21  7:31     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-10  0:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/7] bpf: export bpf_link_inc_not_zero Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-10  0:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/7] selftests/bpf: test struct_ops with epoll Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-10  0:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 6/7] selftests/bpf: detach a struct_ops link from the subsystem managing it Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-21 22:56   ` Amery Hung
2024-05-22  0:31     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-22 17:33       ` Amery Hung
2024-05-10  0:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 7/7] selftests/bpf: make sure bpf_testmod handling racing link destroying well Kui-Feng Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fcae9370-82ab-4c2f-90f5-e3a704f6d11c@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=thinker.li@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.