From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [209.85.220.17] (helo=mail-fx0-f17.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LY23I-0005xu-FA for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:42:12 +0100 Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so2537952fxm.12 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:40:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=iCNCI2UUXUF79c2QYPV0kBIwGjQdPFZrIHSyLO/Yue8=; b=HPWT3BZGW38hbLGKc2XOFI6NakbONT9kfhupt7O6wNObkxDjVCkOBKRqMLEGNGoTY1 2zDob492cZ7vLh9lXQCrcEd+/Udd8POtD0E7h0stS+PFwABil2ECeACwCuuWIqNsBAjK kR91AVVjCc1FdsH7wCPy/woe+5krisrivcUNo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Qst/w1STSTP/P55ooqF1hNVAjsAxNaeFANYd1HMdpDQYZyOvHdaFQTncFvPnpcvQRn eilm6QvJc/9f+h+dWMW3c1w/vuQGACJf4RLp8x9hqBWL3pSAk7TFdIVFDfbgd6a8EbFF upZJAiA9efXTIw3AVWJqnmttG/OYjngdTu3MU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.181.134.12 with SMTP id l12mr346582bkn.80.1234546779143; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:39:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <878woae03q.fsf@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br> References: <200902131728.08634.openembedded@haerwu.biz> <878woae03q.fsf@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:39:39 +0200 Message-ID: From: Ihar Hrachyshka To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: checksums situation X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:42:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Marcin Juszkiewicz writes: > > <...> >> This solution also has one nasty part - now we can keep SRC_URI for >> multiple versions in common file, but if we switch to storing it in >> SRC_URI we will have to change that. >> >> Other solution proposed on IRC was to keep checksums in extra file in >> each directory of packages/ subdirectory. I think that it is not best >> but sounds better then one file. >> >> What do you think? Which way we should go? Do you have other ideas? > <...> > > What about having a checksums for _each_ recipe? > > foo_1.0.bb > foo_1.0.md5sum This will waste directories and will make tree navigation harder. > > This could have the valid one; this also avoid the sorting problem and > like. > > -- > O T A V I O S A L V A D O R > --------------------------------------------- > E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116 > GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 > Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br > --------------------------------------------- > "Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives > you the whole house." > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >